Author Topic: Burma Spitfires  (Read 1681 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2013, 06:17:54 AM »
Okay, bad example. I didn't remember that correctly. I was thinking only of the team that found her, not all the previous teams.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2013, 07:57:23 AM »
Plus, wood or not, burried in a humid muddy soild would yield a pile of metalic rust by now.

There would be very little rust.

"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2013, 02:17:55 PM »
There would be very little rust.

What makes you say that?

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2013, 02:43:21 PM »
What makes you say that?

Because aeroplanes aren't flying cars dingleberry  :old:

Rust requires water, oxygen and ferrite and there isn't very much ferrite in Spitfire. Mostly it's just confined to selected engine parts. Silicon and magnesium alloys oxidise but that's different.


"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #19 on: February 17, 2013, 03:21:03 PM »
You're being too literal.

By rust I meant corrode, oxidize, deteriorate. We know this to happen even when WW2 planes weren't burried in wet soil.

For a minute I thought you might know some special packing method which prevented it, but I was waiting to see what you had to say before getting into that.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #20 on: February 17, 2013, 03:50:57 PM »
You're being too literal.

By rust I meant corrode, oxidize, deteriorate. We know this to happen even when WW2 planes weren't burried in wet soil.


Not literal, accurate. I notice with interest that once again you become defensive and reframe the discussion instead of taking the opportunity to accept knowledge and learn something in good faith.


For a minute I thought you might know some special packing method which prevented it, but I was waiting to see what you had to say before getting into that.

I do. Exclude one of those three components I listed above, like the Spitfire found in the Irish bog (no oxygen). They just recharged the battery, refuelled it and flew it away.  :old:



"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #21 on: February 17, 2013, 05:30:34 PM »
Not literal, accurate. I notice with interest that once again you become defensive and reframe the discussion instead of taking the opportunity to accept knowledge and learn something in good faith.

And I notice more of your patented roadkill. I am not defensive and I am not reframing jack toejam. You were taking "rust" to be too literal. You were trying to nitpick some finer point and single it out as an excuse to throw insults my way. This is common with many of your posts.

I do. Exclude one of those three components I listed above, like the Spitfire found in the Irish bog (no oxygen). They just recharged the battery, refuelled it and flew it away.  :old:

Now, if I was going to act like YOU I'd try to throw insults at you for even making such a comment, but I'm not. And I"m not taking you too literally. Rather 2-faced of you to act so literal in one line (to the point of verbal assault) then in the next turn around and take an exaggerated stance. You're either bipolar or trolling. In either case, I'm not biting the stinky bait.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #22 on: February 17, 2013, 06:14:55 PM »
And I notice more of your patented roadkill. I am not defensive and I am not reframing jack toejam. You were taking "rust" to be too literal. You were trying to nitpick some finer point and single it out as an excuse to throw insults my way. This is common with many of your posts.


You didn't know did you, the difference between rust, corrosion and oxidisation? Rusty aeroplanes  :rolleyes:  Your technical knowledge knows no start does it  :D


Now, if I was going to act like YOU I'd try to throw insults at you for even making such a comment...

...You're either bipolar or trolling. In either case, I'm not biting the stinky bait.

...and more classic Krusty, avoid explicitly breaking the rules while still sneaking in your retaliatory insult. Excellent.





"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #23 on: February 17, 2013, 06:25:47 PM »
Krusty, are you always a victim? 
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Burma Spitfires
« Reply #24 on: February 17, 2013, 11:43:15 PM »
Now, if I was going to act like YOU I'd try to throw insults at you for even making such a comment, but I'm not. And I"m not taking you too literally. Rather 2-faced of you to act so literal in one line (to the point of verbal assault) then in the next turn around and take an exaggerated stance. You're either bipolar or trolling. In either case, I'm not biting the stinky bait.

 :headscratch:
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.