Author Topic: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI  (Read 17696 times)

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #45 on: September 22, 2013, 08:53:32 PM »
Dan,

  Do you have any information on the "basta" a special IX that ran on 150 fuel?

    IIRC they had a very short engine overhaul time but I don't recall more than that.




   :salute

As Karnak stated, many were using that fuel in particular in the summer of 44 chasing V-1s
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #46 on: September 22, 2013, 08:56:09 PM »
By late 44 they were mostly flying from bases on the continent.  Not much need for more bomber escorts by that time though.

That was an old joke from Airwarrior Karnak :)

We had a scenario where the design limited the Spits to 75 fuel.  The Airwarrior birds had no drop tanks so it went a long way to neutering the Spits in that Scenario.  It was the first time I had a group in a Scenario and it was tough knowing you could cross the coast and basically have to return home due to fuel.  I was younger and less understanding then and pitched a bit of a fit about it :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #47 on: September 22, 2013, 10:17:10 PM »
As Karnak stated, many were using that fuel in particular in the summer of 44 chasing V-1s
This is Mossie centric, but I imagine the Spits worked the same.  The Mossie's that were modified to take 150 octane for anti-Diver patrols retained that modification and kept using 150 octane once they were moved to other tasks.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #48 on: September 23, 2013, 02:09:32 AM »
I know it's not at all historical, but I'd love to see a K4 modeled on "what it" usage of 150 octane fuel.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #49 on: September 23, 2013, 09:14:15 AM »
Some G-10/K-4 units evidently did fly on C3 fuel, but information is very limited. Mostly just photographs of 109s with C3 stickers on them. C3 would increase power to ~2,000 hp.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #50 on: September 23, 2013, 09:18:35 AM »
I know it's not at all historical, but I'd love to see a K4 modeled on "what it" usage of 150 octane fuel.

Do you mean the the ones using 1.98ata and C3 fuel? The use of only C3 fuel only gave ~1800hp.

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #51 on: September 23, 2013, 09:27:36 AM »
I've come to this thread late - what is Franz's issue, and which marks does he say did not see combat?

 :headscratch:
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #52 on: September 23, 2013, 11:08:58 AM »
I've come to this thread late - what is Franz's issue, and which marks does he say did not see combat?

 :headscratch:
He claims to believe that only 12 Mk XVI's saw combat.  I don't think he actually believes this, I think the claim fits his fancy as it matches well with his detestation of anything British.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #53 on: September 23, 2013, 11:10:39 AM »
Ah.

That's a fairly spectacular claim.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #54 on: September 23, 2013, 11:59:28 AM »
C3 was 100 octane, no?
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline SirNuke

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1297
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #55 on: September 23, 2013, 12:05:00 PM »
C3 was 100 octane, no?

 I think its a bit more complex than that, as petrol chemistry is

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #56 on: September 23, 2013, 12:20:08 PM »
I've come to this thread late - what is Franz's issue

He's Schlowy, that's his issue.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Fox

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 169
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #57 on: September 23, 2013, 12:39:29 PM »
The attached link has some interesting information about the 150 octane fuel.

 http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/150grade/150-grade-fuel.html

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #58 on: September 23, 2013, 12:41:46 PM »
I've come to this thread late - what is Franz's issue,
He played with a screwdriver in the power socket and he has been like this since.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10453
Re: Clarifications about the Spitfire Mk IX and XVI
« Reply #59 on: September 23, 2013, 12:59:51 PM »
As Karnak stated, many were using that fuel in particular in the summer of 44 chasing V-1s

  It was a long tima ago I read about the "Basta" but I seem to recall it was out of Italy and they not only ran 150 fuel but push the MAP somewhat past what it was rated for and the result was something like 10 hours or less and the manifolds would burn out.

  I was wondering if you had any more imformation or maybe a good book to read about it,ya I don't just read the german stuff!!!! :devil



    :salute