Author Topic: Grumman Rules the Sky  (Read 13802 times)

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #300 on: January 21, 2014, 04:35:18 AM »
You've got that the wrong way 'round Brooke..

A 1946 USN airshow stunt has nothing to do with an officially sanctioned FAI World time-to-climb record..
so what is the FIA SANCTIONED time to climb numbers for the P-51h?
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15506
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #301 on: January 21, 2014, 01:48:19 PM »
You've got that the wrong way 'round Brooke..

A 1946 USN airshow stunt has nothing to do with an officially sanctioned FAI World time-to-climb record..

We were talking about a Bearcat test done in 1946, and the title and subject of this topic was not changed to "FAI:  a discussion of it's record keeping policies, 1950 to 1951".  So, no, I don't have it the wrong way around.

FAI is irrelevant to all of this:

Quote
From Thierry Montigneaux, Assistant Secretary General of the at FAI:  “No performance set in 1946 could therefore have qualified as an official ‘world’ record, as this category of record did not exist then."

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #302 on: January 21, 2014, 02:58:57 PM »
W.W. Dunno, ask Widey, the FAI thing - it was his claim, bogus or otherwise..

My understanding is the jet-bent USAAF wanted to do the 'sound barrier' not mess around with airshow stunts.
They didn't even run a recip 'Thunderbirds' display team, unlike the Navy 'Blue Angels'..



Brooke, when will you realize that the FAI has been responsible for aviation World Records for over a century..

When was it - do you suppose - that they started separate records for recips & turbo-jets? 1919? or 1949?
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #303 on: January 21, 2014, 03:30:29 PM »
We were talking about a Bearcat test done in 1946, and the title and subject of this topic was not changed to "FAI:  a discussion of it's record keeping policies, 1950 to 1951".  So, no, I don't have it the wrong way around.

FAI is irrelevant to all of this:



Brooke, just how do you think new category FAI records are entered into existence?

By the proposal being put to FAI for ratification consideration,
 - something that in the case of a time-to-climb record, the USN did not do, but the RAF clearly did..

"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #304 on: January 21, 2014, 03:55:39 PM »
Because the only person who gives a flip is you and they were too busy being big balled aviators flying Sierra Hotel airplanes to do the paperwork?

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #305 on: January 21, 2014, 04:08:16 PM »
Did you read post #199 yet, G?

Here's some `51H info for you, since you are a fan..

Steve Couches has a bit of `51H stick time..
& he reckons..

"I always say - you drive the `51D, but you can fly a `51H.
It weighs 1,600lbs less & you can take off with a full fuel load in 8-900ft."

Those tail-hook heroes weren't the only game in town, 'cept maybe -  in the cunning stunt dept..

I'm not bothered, & anyhow, it was Widey's  fanciful 'story' that started the whole F8F/FAI thing..
« Last Edit: January 21, 2014, 04:36:50 PM by J.A.W. »
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #306 on: January 21, 2014, 04:39:30 PM »
Did you read post #199 yet, G?

Here's some `51H info for you, since you are a fan..

Steve Couches has a bit of `51H stick time..
& he reckons..

"I always say - you drive the `51D, but you can fly a `51H.
It weighs 1,600lbs less & you can take off with a full fuel load in 8-900ft."

Those tail-hook heroes weren't the only game in town, 'cept maybe -  in the cunning stunt dept..

I'm not bothered, & anyhow, it was Widey's  fanciful 'story' that started the whole F8F/FAI thing..

Thanks for the entertainment - character be damned :rock
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15506
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #307 on: January 21, 2014, 05:40:07 PM »
Brooke, just how do you think new category FAI records are entered into existence?

By the proposal being put to FAI for ratification consideration,
 - something that in the case of a time-to-climb record, the USN did not do, but the RAF clearly did..

You need a new topic (one other than this topic) for a discussion of FAI's record keeping policies, 1950 to 1951.

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #308 on: January 21, 2014, 06:18:59 PM »
Yeah, agreed Brooke, its done.
& the whole FAI/F8F 1946 thing - it just was another spurious story of Widey's anyhow..
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #309 on: January 21, 2014, 09:11:00 PM »
Simple question.. When Rare Bear broke the time to climb record for piston-engine, prop driven aircraft, what record did it break?

Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #310 on: January 21, 2014, 09:16:43 PM »
Well Widey, that kinda depends..

Do you mean an actual FAI World Record?

Or some salty ol' flim-flam tail-hook shenanigans?
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #311 on: January 21, 2014, 09:35:58 PM »
Well Widey, that kinda depends..

Do you mean an actual FAI World Record?

Or some salty ol' flim-flam tail-hook shenanigans?

As I said, it's a simple question..... You're just ducking it.
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #312 on: January 21, 2014, 09:37:48 PM »
& What is the current FAI time-to-climb recip record, & does it actually better the R-B,
 ( or the `46 barnacle-scrapers, & unofficial, even) record?
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8800
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #313 on: January 21, 2014, 09:49:08 PM »
& What is the current FAI time-to-climb recip record, & does it actually better the R-B,
 ( or the `46 barnacle-scrapers, & unofficial, even) record?

I'm asking the question... You're answering.
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline GAReaper

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Grumman Rules the Sky
« Reply #314 on: January 21, 2014, 09:50:48 PM »
Wow I can't believe this is still going on.

And JAW since obviously you know everything (clearly since you have continued arguing with multiple people telling you otherwise), quit ducking the question and just answer it. Or do you need time still to continue your google search for the answer?

Seriously dude what is the point of you carrying on for 21 pages now ranting and raving when it has nothing to do with you. None of these planes are in the game (which it doesn't even appear you play). Clearly you are carrying on just to get a rise out of people, or because you are an attention seeker. Either way pretty sad, and I honestly can't believe the admins have let it carry on this long.

Anyway, I'm done here. Not in my nature to start crap or troll.  :salute guys.
Bones87
56th FG Zemke's Wolfpack