Why do so many people believe the U.S. hasn't went to the Moon or even space?

[branch37]

I only knew one person that said he didnt believe we landed on the moon, and he was a kid in jr high wanting attention, so there ya go.

[BuckShot]

The earth moon dwelling aliens are the ones who prescribed chem-trails... Duh!

[Shuffler]

 "Opinion polls taken in various locations have shown that between 6% and 20% of Americans and 28% of Russians surveyed believe that the manned landings were faked."
from  Wikipedia   ;Moon landing conspiracy theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

''between 6% and 20%"   from 318 million USA population= between 19.08 and 63.6 million Americans believe that the manned landings were faked    

(Image removed from quote.)

 interesting videos; http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm

Even that wiki is based on no facts. What opinion polls? That is also a wide spread. Lol

[guncrasher]

hard for me to believe that forest gump would be capable of taking a rocket to the moon.  and lt dan would be on the ground trying to figure out how to save them.


semp

[zack1234]

Why have we not been back then?

[Someguy63]

Why have we not been back then?

Aliens

[Hajo]

Why have we not been back then?

We are landing probes on Mars.  What reason would we have to go back unless it is to waste tax payers money?  Been there done that.

[Someguy63]

We are landing probes on Mars.  What reason would we have to go back unless it is to waste tax payers money?  Been there done that.

Moon base?

[zack1234]

We are landing probes on Mars.  What reason would we have to go back unless it is to waste tax payers money?  Been there done that.

Wasting taxes on Mars is ok?

[Copprhed]

Just met a chemtrails supporter the other day...nutjob.

[Tumor]

  To be honest... it's possible that the Moon missions were entirely faked.  I'm told Elvis and Morrison are shacked up on the dark side.

[FESS67]

I am sat on the fence on this one...BUT...I am 90% on the side of the disbeliever.  For me it is the inconsistencies with the photographs that has me doubting the most.  Plus I struggle with the film of the lunar module leaving the moon and the camera panning to follow it.

I am not saying that wireless or remote control technologies did not did not exist to enable that shot to happen...I am just cynical.

[Chalenge]

The main reason people choose not to believe is that telescopes cannot see the lander, because the lens would have to be about 200 meters radius to define anything of such a small size.

It's not always about education, or intellect. Ever met someone you could overpower mentally? As in, they agree with everything you say? Some people are just that way. Others, just can't believe in anything they haven't seen for themselves without some positive proof.

There are a lot of very good reasons to go back to the moon and build a permanent space station there. You have to understand, also, that there are a lot of people that are against operations like NASA simply because they see no direct and immediate benefit for themselves. Tomorrow is just too far away for some of these people. Others just want to save turtles. Its really random, huh?

[FESS67]

True Chalenge true.  But the photos.....the photos....how are they explained?  From memory....  same hill different shots with Rover and rocks moved.....shadows...explain the infill of shadows.....shadows...explain the fact a rock has 2 shadows.....shadows...explain a shadow that goes against the sun.......you know, that sort of basic stuff.

Willing to believe because if they did not go it is one hell of a cover up........but....well, you know...

[zack1234]

I think it's fake