Author Topic: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic  (Read 28942 times)

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15522
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
"Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« on: July 30, 2018, 02:50:12 AM »
This is the topic for discussing the design of the "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario.

Your comments and thoughts -- if you can make them civilly -- are welcome.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15522
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/

Offline Vudu15

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3055
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2018, 03:29:16 AM »
I can tell why you didnt want me as CO.

Why are the allies getting spit8s instead of 9s I thought in 43 the 31st was still transitioning from 5s to 9s?

What are point generating land targets? Actual hangers? Or buildings?

Sent from my LG-H871 using Tapatalk

"No odds too great"

"I was a horse ahead at the end" - Nathan Bedford Forrest
Training Video List https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL54E5CE

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15522
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2018, 03:45:51 AM »
Weiser has asked if we can put in another Spitfire group into the design.

To add another Spitfire group, we would need to add another group to the Luftwaffe of course.  Also, we should increase the number of bombers a little to keep their ratio.

Thus registration would go from 68 to 84.  84 is higher than what registrations have been running, so I'm not sure it's a good idea.

But we are opening it up to discussion here to see what folks think.


Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15522
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2018, 03:50:41 AM »
Why are the allies getting spit8s instead of 9s I thought in 43 the 31st was still transitioning from 5s to 9s?

I don't care if they are Spit 9's or Spit 8's.  I have read that they had both 8's and 9's there in about equal numbers, but I am no expert on the topic.

I'll leave it to others to argue if they should be Spit 8's or 9's.

Quote
What are point generating land targets? Actual hangers? Or buildings?

All hangars (fighter, bomber, vehicle) and all bunkers (ammo, fuel, barracks).

Offline TWCAxew

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1162
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2018, 08:50:53 AM »
But we are opening it up to discussion here to see what folks think.

Speaking for my squadron, it will be composed out of guys who will fly for the first time a scenario or don't fly in it regularly. So that should bumb numbers up a touch. They will fly in it because I asked them to.

DutchVII
DutchVII / ULDutch
~~2019 KOTH/TOC Champion~~
https://ahevents.net/index.php/events/scenarios/about-scenarios
4 time scenario C.O. ~ As dew appears, As dew Vanishes, Such is my life, Everything in this world, Is but a dream within a dream.

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2018, 10:45:34 AM »
Will the 190A5s have bombs enabled?
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline jeffn

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1082
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2018, 10:56:11 AM »
Hiya Larry,

In reply to your question, from the write up

"Fighters have no bombs or rockets."

-JeffN-
Jagdgeschwader 11

JG11

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2018, 11:16:08 AM »
That's why I asked because I'm confused. I may be mistaken but I thought SG groups were, for the most part, ground attack.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8946
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2018, 12:17:20 PM »
That's why I asked because I'm confused. I may be mistaken but I thought SG groups were, for the most part, ground attack.

Yes, the 190's in Sicily belonged to ground attack units: Schlachtgeschwader 2(Sch.G.2) and Schnellkampfgeschwader 10(SKG 10)

There are mentions in this book of II/Sch.G.2 mounting fighter sorties, both in escort and defense roles.
http://airwarpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/Sample-Fw-190-in-the-Battle-for-Sicily.pdf
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2018, 12:18:01 PM »
I can tell why you didnt want me as CO.

Why are the allies getting spit8s instead of 9s I thought in 43 the 31st was still transitioning from 5s to 9s?

What are point generating land targets? Actual hangers? Or buildings?

Sent from my LG-H871 using Tapatalk

31st had a mix of Vs and IXs from April of 43.  They got the VIIIs in August 43
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2018, 12:29:33 PM »
Yes, the 190's in Sicily belonged to ground attack units: Schlachtgeschwader 2(Sch.G.2) and Schnellkampfgeschwader 10(SKG 10)

There are mentions in this book of II/Sch.G.2 mounting fighter sorties, both in escort and defense roles.
http://airwarpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/Sample-Fw-190-in-the-Battle-for-Sicily.pdf


I figured they must have run escort missions if their bombs have been disabled. I just wanted clarification. P.S. do you have that book? If so is it a good read? I need to add more to my bookshelf and since my birthday is coming up I can get away with spending a few hundred on books with the wife.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2018, 12:30:11 PM »
I'm sure the Luftwaffe experts will correct me if I'm wrong, but it also appears JG 53 was in G6s by the time of the Pantellaria operations in June of 43
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline KCDitto

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3219
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2018, 12:36:30 PM »
They had a mix of G-4s and G-6s. We don't have G-4s, so I requested a group of G-2s.
Ditto  "WHITE 11"
"Masters of the Air" Scenario -JG54

Offline Vudu15

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3055
Re: "Pantelleria, 1943" scenario-design topic
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2018, 12:37:47 PM »
Right and this fight was May to June of 43 so allies should still be running 9s not 8s.

Sent from my LG-H871 using Tapatalk

"No odds too great"

"I was a horse ahead at the end" - Nathan Bedford Forrest
Training Video List https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL54E5CE