Author Topic: The question on spitfires  (Read 1542 times)

Offline 1Cane

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 899
The question on spitfires
« on: October 17, 2019, 02:38:17 PM »
Why don't the spitfire14& 16 have a bubble canopy? :airplane:
AkCaine

Offline Chris79

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2019, 03:50:07 PM »



That’s an early 14


Chuikov

Offline mikeWe9a

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2019, 11:14:09 AM »
The fact is that both the Mk 14 and 16 did have bubble canopies - that is, production of both mks eventually had bubble canopies.

Spitfire variant numbers were not really in chronological order, and in many instances were not made to replace a previous mk, so it doesn't necessarily follow that a Mk 16 will have all of the refinements of lower numbered variants.  The Mk 16 for instance, was a Mk 9 in all respects, but it used the Packard version of the Merlin engine instead of Rolls Royce, presumably because there was a shortage of Rolls Royce Merlins - there were enough differences in the engine (imperial vs metric measurements, etc) that a different Mk number was needed to ensure correct logistical support.  The Mk 9 was still in production at that point, and eventually both the 9 and 16 were produced with bubble canopies.

Mike

Offline nooby52

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 990
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2019, 08:54:13 AM »
I did not know that about the MK 9/ 16. Very interesting.

Flying as "South52" for VF-17 Jolly Rogers
17 Squadron - The Hardest Day Battle of Britain
204 Kokutai - Target Rabaul
610 Squadron -TFT Battle of Britain

Offline atlau

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1221
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2019, 09:10:31 AM »
The fact is that both the Mk 14 and 16 did have bubble canopies - that is, production of both mks eventually had bubble canopies.

Spitfire variant numbers were not really in chronological order, and in many instances were not made to replace a previous mk, so it doesn't necessarily follow that a Mk 16 will have all of the refinements of lower numbered variants.  The Mk 16 for instance, was a Mk 9 in all respects, but it used the Packard version of the Merlin engine instead of Rolls Royce, presumably because there was a shortage of Rolls Royce Merlins - there were enough differences in the engine (imperial vs metric measurements, etc) that a different Mk number was needed to ensure correct logistical support.  The Mk 9 was still in production at that point, and eventually both the 9 and 16 were produced with bubble canopies.

Mike

What about the wingtips?

Offline mikeWe9a

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 261
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2019, 11:32:55 AM »
What about the wingtips?

Yes, the Mk 16 had clipped wingtips.  I misspoke (typed?) above.  The Mk 9 was built in several versions during the war, both as a high altitude fighter (H.F.) and low altitude fighter (L.F.), with differing engines.  The Mk 16 was based on the L.F. Mk 9.  At the end of the Mk 9 production, L.F. versions with the cut down fuselage and bubble canopy were built with the clipped wing as well.  According to Wikipedia, most of these Mk 9s ended up serving with the South African Air Force (SAAF) after the end of WWII.

Mike

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11617
      • Trainer's Website
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2019, 12:21:06 PM »
What about the wingtips?

Wingtips were bolt on parts. The "clipped" wing just used a different end piece. Same wing, different wingtip.
 
« Last Edit: October 21, 2019, 12:23:27 PM by FLS »

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15667
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2019, 04:55:19 PM »
Spitfires are Awesome!   :aok
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline potsNpans

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 694
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2019, 07:32:09 PM »
Spits are fer' sissies  :neener:

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2019, 10:15:55 PM »
Yes, the Mk 16 had clipped wingtips.  I misspoke (typed?) above.  The Mk 9 was built in several versions during the war, both as a high altitude fighter (H.F.) and low altitude fighter (L.F.), with differing engines.  The Mk 16 was based on the L.F. Mk 9.  At the end of the Mk 9 production, L.F. versions with the cut down fuselage and bubble canopy were built with the clipped wing as well.  According to Wikipedia, most of these Mk 9s ended up serving with the South African Air Force (SAAF) after the end of WWII.

Mike
It took 30-45 minutes of ground crew time to change wing tips on a Spitfire.  They could be clipped, standard or extended.  It wasn't dependent on the engine or mark number, at least from somewhere in the Mk V production run on.  Late in the war high level operations were not in as much demand so clipped wings became pretty common on Merlin Spits.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7257
Re: The question on spitfires
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2019, 05:40:26 PM »
Spitfires are Awesome!   :aok
...and the SpitV the best of everything!

More to add to Karnak's point - in the late stages of the war, with forward operating bases located deep inside France and the perimeter of Germany, the allied forces no longer had to climb out to 20'000+ ft to engage enemy German fighters...they were themselves barely off the ground before being engaged.  At 350-400MPH, a late war Allied fighter could fly into German-occupied territory in minutes. Conversely, German pilots only had minutes to get into the air once their EWR detected a fighter sweep.

It's like flying for the Rooks next to an occupied Bishop base. They just come up from the airfield in swarms!
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech