I'll give it a go and see if I can find suitable details.
That will be interesting. I await the results.
I know of a couple of cases where the judge flat out asked Giuliani if he was alleging voter fraud had occurred, and he nearly fell over himself saying, "Oh no, no, no your honor. I'm not alleging that!"
Because you can talk all the crap you want on Tucker Carlson but people tend to think better of it when standing in front of a federal judge.
Others were dismissed because the evidence presented in the filling was so ridiculous that it could be dismissed out of hand. Completely inadmissible crap like, "I heard from a guy, that heard from a guy, that talked to a guy in bar that said he saw something on the internet that definitely looked fishy."
Or "these stats sure look fishy." You don't bring crap like that into a federal court. Maybe law enforcement might like to start an investigation based on stuff like that, but you better not be filing before federal judge with a bunch of internet conspiracy rumor horse crap. That's a good way to get deservedly professionally sanctioned. Or just get your law license suspended like Giuliani.
Some were dismissed because of lack of standing. I mean it's like 1st year law stuff. Even laymen ought to get that you can't sue over something you are not a party to. Where did these Trump lawyers get their licenses? From a Cracker-Jack box?
I think there were 63 Trump lawsuits filed. I think he won 1 on some minor process issue. many of those were in front of conservative judges and many were in fact in front of Trump appointees. You didn't get the results you wanted so you claim the system is rigged.
So after about case 30 or so I stopped paying attention. I saw nothing in any of them that looked like there was any there there. Apparently 62 federal judges agreed. I'm sure they had a different opinion over on the Q-Anon forums.
