Global Warming: Facts Request FYI

[Slade]

Request to AI (Bard): Please give me the best most accurate Internet links on the current facts on global warming.


Response
Sure, here are some of the best and most accurate internet links on the current facts on global warming:

- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): The IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change. Their website provides a wealth of information on the science of climate change, its impacts, and potential solutions. Link: https://www.ipcc.ch/
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): NASA's website has a section on climate change that provides information on the science, impacts, and solutions. Link: https://climate.nasa.gov/
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): NOAA's website has a section on climate change that provides information on the science, impacts, and solutions. Link: https://www.climate.gov/
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): The UNFCCC is the international treaty that was adopted in 1992 to address climate change. Their website provides information on the treaty, its negotiations, and its implementation. Link: https://unfccc.int/
- Climate Central: Climate Central is a non-profit organization that provides clear and concise information about climate change. Their website has a variety of resources, including articles, graphics, and data visualizations. Link: https://www.climatecentral.org/

It is important to be critical of the information you find online. Not all sources are created equal, and some may contain inaccurate or misleading information. When evaluating a source, be sure to consider the author's credentials, the source's funding, and the overall quality of the information.


Do whatever it takes to not fool yourself into thinking something is true that is not,
or that something is not true that is. -Neil deGrasse Tyson

[DmonSlyr]

Ask it to dispute global warming with counter research and see what it says.

[Slade]

Question to AI (Bard): Is there any legitimate counter-research that global warming is not happening?  If so what are the sources?

Response:

There is some counter research that suggests that global warming is not happening, but it is not considered to be legitimate by the vast majority of climate scientists. This research is often based on cherry-picked data or flawed methodologies, and it has been repeatedly debunked by peer-reviewed studies.

Some of the most well-known sources of counter research on global warming include:

    The Heartland Institute: A conservative think tank that has published several reports questioning the science of climate change.
    The Cato Institute: Another conservative think tank that has published similar reports.
    The Global Warming Policy Foundation: A British think tank that has also published reports on climate change.

The research from these organizations has been criticized by many scientists, who argue that it is based on flawed data and methodologies. For example, a 2015 study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that the Heartland Institute's reports on climate change were "riddled with errors," and that they "misrepresented the scientific consensus on climate change."

In conclusion, there is no legitimate counter research that suggests that global warming is not happening. The vast majority of climate scientists agree that the planet is warming, and that human activity is the primary cause. The research from organizations like the Heartland Institute and the Cato Institute is not considered to be legitimate by the scientific community.

[Arlo]

You tell 'em, Slade. In. 

[Eviscerate]

Question to AI (Bard): Is there any legitimate counter-research that global warming is not happening?  If so what are the sources?

Response:

There is some counter research that suggests that global warming is not happening, but it is not considered to be legitimate by the vast majority of climate scientists. This research is often based on cherry-picked data or flawed methodologies, and it has been repeatedly debunked by peer-reviewed studies.

Some of the most well-known sources of counter research on global warming include:

    The Heartland Institute: A conservative think tank that has published several reports questioning the science of climate change.
    The Cato Institute: Another conservative think tank that has published similar reports.
    The Global Warming Policy Foundation: A British think tank that has also published reports on climate change.

The research from these organizations has been criticized by many scientists, who argue that it is based on flawed data and methodologies. For example, a 2015 study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that the Heartland Institute's reports on climate change were "riddled with errors," and that they "misrepresented the scientific consensus on climate change."

In conclusion, there is no legitimate counter research that suggests that global warming is not happening. The vast majority of climate scientists agree that the planet is warming, and that human activity is the primary cause. The research from organizations like the Heartland Institute and the Cato Institute is not considered to be legitimate by the scientific community.

Bard sounds like a smart dude.

[DmonSlyr]

Sounds like it's pretty biased towards one position...surely it's not definitely not the sun though.

Gotta go back to the stone ages to save the planet! PROGRESS at it's finest. 

[Slade]

Do whatever it takes to not fool yourself into thinking something is true that is not,
or that something is not true that is. -Neil deGrasse Tyson

[Arlo]

Reality is biased. 

[Slade]

Reality is biased.

Reality is only biased for trolls and autocrats.  They need you to see something that is not there.  That possibly disagrees with their agenda or beliefs.

Notice I simply presented the Global Warming information as-is.  Unedited.  Uncherry-picked.  Gave all my sources.

Reality: The quality or state of being actual or true.
-The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

[Slade]

I went ahead and posted the same question to all the other major AI sources on the planet (ChatGPT, Pi etc.).  They all basically said the same thing.

Either ALL the AI on this planet and ALL the major legit world scientific orgs are wrong or...[connect the dots]...what they responded with is true.

Just a thought. 


EDIT: "In critical moments, men sometimes see exactly what they wish to see." –Spock, Star Trek

[sparky127]

You don't think scientists could be biased towards the money just s teensy tiny bit?

[Slade]

You don't think scientists could be biased towards the money just s teensy tiny bit?

All of them in every legit world org?  All AI?  All major non-denominational accredited colleges? The military? Insurance agencies?  They are all agreeing on the facts of this.

Just say'n. 


EDIT: I wonder what industries need to put out false information on this. Oh, Big Oil and friends!

[Meatwad]

They all go by whatever the popular opinion is. If you speak out against whatever the popular thing is to do or what you are told to say/believe, you are "cancelled" and your online presence cease to exist.

[Slade]

Guys,

I know this is a really hard pill for some of you to swallow. You are allowed to change though.  I'm not some tree-hugger.  I'm prob the same political party as you.  I just am a little more objective on this and trying to help a brother\sista see this outside a news silo.

There is no reward for being on the wrong side of history on this one.  We are smarter than this.  We are mature enough to see that everything is not a conspiracy theory or woke or whatever. 

[sparky127]

All of them in every legit world org?  All AI?  All major non-denominational accredited colleges? The military? Insurance agencies?  They are all agreeing on the facts of this.

Just say'n. 


EDIT: I wonder what industries need to put out false information on this. Oh, Big Oil and friends!

AI just does internet research and reports the findings.  I'm glad you brought up insurance.  Why, if they're on board with climate change.. do they continue to cover real estate in areas which have been guaranteed to be horribly affected by climate change?  Seems that they say one thing while doing something completely different...