Global Warming: Facts Request FYI

[Meatwad]

AI just does internet research and reports the findings.  I'm glad you brought up insurance.  Why, if they're on board with climate change.. do they continue to cover real estate in areas which have been guaranteed to be horribly affected by climate change?  Seems that they say one thing while doing something completely different...

I could see them using that as an excuse to refuse payouts or make you pay a premium simply because it would increase their profit margins and people would believe it because they used certain keywords

[guncrasher]

I could see them using that as an excuse to refuse payouts or make you pay a premium simply because it would increase their profit margins and people would believe it because they used certain keywords

some of the companies are mutual companies. in the same markets their tastes are also going up.  explain that.


semp

[Dadtallica]

Some of you are really just plain stupid.

[Eagler]

Best bogeyman yet.. them ole terrorism terrorists must be on vaca..

Independence Day aliens might take the title with time but for now we are battling hot sticky days and anyone not on board will be canceled

Can't get in the way of all the fresh printed $$$ going to modern day Solyndra

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solyndra

Eagler

[oboe]

You don't think scientists could be biased towards the money just s teensy tiny bit?

I'm glad someone brought this up, because generally I'm a 'follow the money' kind of guy myself.   The U.S. government alone is planning to spend hundreds of billions on climate change efforts over the coming decade:

Aug 22 (Reuters) - The U.S. government will spend more than $500 billion on climate technology and clean energy over the next decade under three recently enacted laws, an analysis by non-profit RMI found.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-spend-more-than-500-bln-climate-over-decade-under-three-laws-study-says-2022-08-22/

In comparison, the oil and gas industry has delivered $2.8bn (£2.3bn) a day in pure profit for the last 50 years

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/21/revealed-oil-sectors-staggering-profits-last-50-years



The pay of scientists and profits of companies involved in climate change research and mitigation are a tiny fraction of oil and gas company profits.

To your question about why insurance companies would continue to offer coverage in areas to be affected adversely, they are beginning to pull out of Florida:

Farmers Insurance pulls out of Florida, affecting 100,000 policyholders

[Busher]

Guys,

  We are smarter than this.  We are mature enough to see that everything is not a conspiracy theory or woke or whatever. 

I suggest that current events tend to show that your statement, while optimistic, might not be accurate.

[Slade]

Why, if they're on board with climate change.. do they continue to cover real estate in areas which have been guaranteed to be horribly affected by climate change? 

Good point.  Here in Florida, Insurance company-after-company have bailed and are bailing.  It's too much for them to handle.

[Meatwad]

Here is something to ponder

Right now the govt is dumping hundreds of millions into research and studies on how global warming aka climate change is going to kill the planet

BUT WAIT

Now instead what if they decided to use the same hundreds of millions in research for studies to prove that climate change is actually false and the planet is just going through one of its climate cycles that have happened since the planet formed? I can 100% guarantee that all these new studies will come out suddenly debunking climate change. Why would that happen? Because the " climate scientists" are suddenly now being paid to find a way to make the numbers work in their favor. As long as they pump out the results that they are paid to find, they will continue to get free grant money to support their studies

[DmonSlyr]

I'm curious what it says about the world warming 10,000 years ago to melt the ice age, or what caused the ice age to begin with. Was it Human caused then? Where did all of that water in north America near Montana go? 

Also, why aren't organizations described considered liberal when it suggested that anything challenging them were from "conservative sources".

Why doesn't it mention all of the scientist who have raised red about this data?

Did you know that the models used to measure global climate change are also "man made"

Can you ask Bard if Depopulation would help solve global warming?

Why are they are they trying to come up with methods to block the sun if it's not the sun that is causing hotter global temps?

Certainly makes you wonder...

[MiloMorai]

8,050,595,090 people don't cause air pollution?

[nopoop]

Just remember John Kerry DOES NOT OWN A JET !!!

His wife does...

[DmonSlyr]

8,050,595,090 people don't cause air pollution?

Air pollution doesn't cause warming... how many times I gotta explain this...hot air rises and cools, compounds break down in the atmosphere. Just because a local area is hotter, doesn't mean there is more pollution. The whole promise is flawed, as I've stated over and over again. Look at the massive oceans. Somewhere in the middle of the Pacific, has the pollution level changed for that area to be hotter. No, it hasn't.

[Slade]

Ultimately, no matter how many legit sources are used or how many diverse data sources are used, there will still be those that will not be convinced.

I guess even when the Titanic was going down there were those that would not believe their own eyes. Not believe the staggeringly overwhelming facts and calls by the trusted crew members.

"Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours." -Richard Bach

[Meatwad]

I am convinced the sources will continue to scream like chicken little as long as their funding comes from the people that tell them what to say

Also this

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-hottest-earths-ever-been

So can the alarmists explain what factories, fossil fuel use, human intervention caused this? Oh wait..........

There is scientific proof that this is not the first time this planet has gotten slightly warmer, but then again funding certain projects is another way to launder billions of $$$ into certain peoples pockets

[DmonSlyr]

Ultimately, no matter how many legit sources are used or how many diverse data sources are used, there will still be those that will not be convinced.

I guess even when the Titanic was going down there were those that would not believe their own eyes. Not believe the staggeringly overwhelming facts and calls by the trusted crew members.

"Argue for your limitations, and sure enough they're yours." -Richard Bach

What you know about "Illusions"?  That is one of my favorite books.

It's not about legit sources. It's about control and fear. There is literally nothing humans can do. They keep pushing the goalpost back every 10 years. When it doesn't happen, they say, well another 10 years, and the another 10 years after that. All while they continue to buy Beach front property. The oceans haven't risen, the storms are all the same, they just hit different spots, and more build up of homes and neighborhoods makes the damage cost more.

If everyone stopped every thing, it wouldn't cool the earth one bit. I can guarantee it. Just look at covid and lack of economic activity. That should have stalled out warming and reset it based on how the earth works. It really didn't, and the fear remains the same. We will all be dead by the time any actual earthly warming will have any negative effects on humanity.