A bold move

[TyFoo]

It's actually pretty simple. If they don't have ovaries and reproductive organs that can produce a baby inside their belly. They are not female.

That is "pretty simple".

Its good to know that friends, moms, grandmothers, perhaps somebodies wife - or any other woman that ever contracted some form of Cancer, or Uterine/ Cervical issues requiring a radical hysterectomy, are not considered women.

[Eagler]

Many more upset with the directive that they have to report back to the office..WFH has been fired for 10's of thousands!

Eagler

[Shuffler]

I blame Klinger on MASH for starting the whole thing lol

Eagler

He was up to the same shenanigans as those today.

[Shuffler]

That is "pretty simple".

Its good to know that friends, moms, grandmothers, perhaps somebodies wife - or any other woman that ever contracted some form of Cancer, or Uterine/ Cervical issues requiring a radical hysterectomy, are not considered women.

You are being silly now.

[guncrasher]

You are being silly now.

but correct.   there's always exceptions.  there's a couple of million people that don't fit that definition.


semp

[DmonSlyr]

but correct.   there's always exceptions.  there's a couple of million people that don't fit that definition.


semp

Um no, having surgery to remove them doesn't make them any less of a woman. They still did not develop biologically the same way a man would in the stumach area. We are talking about different reproductive organs between a man and a woman and their physical strength in their stumach. If you or any one here cannot acknowledge that, than clearly yall need to go take a biology class.

[DmonSlyr]

And none of this is relevant for this thread. We all know the intention. What we are discussing is that you are legally no longer a man.

It's saying that at conception unchanged by man, that produces a small or large reproductive cell. So at conception it leads to either a small or large cell, that naturally determines male or female. It's a natural part of biology not doctored by man. And my arguement is that if it is born with 0 woman's reproductive organs, it's not a woman and should not qualify as a woman biologically.

[guncrasher]

Um no, having surgery to remove them doesn't make them any less of a woman. They still did not develop biologically the same way a man would in the stumach area. We are talking about different reproductive organs between a man and a woman and their physical strength in their stumach. If you or any one here cannot acknowledge that, than clearly yall need to go take a biology class.

in the 80's california tried to define sex as xx/xy.  they came close to it until somebody said what about the exceptions, those that are not xx/xy. what do we label them. as they would have to create another category. which went against what they believed.

if you think there's only xx/xy you are so wrong.


semp

[Busher]

in the 80's california tried to define sex as xx/xy.  they came close to it until somebody said what about the exceptions, those that are not xx/xy. what do we label them. as they would have to create another category. which went against what they believed.

if you think there's only xx/xy you are so wrong.


semp

Well said Semp. I wonder if a society that didn't judge others and minded their own business might work?

[DmonSlyr]

in the 80's california tried to define sex as xx/xy.  they came close to it until somebody said what about the exceptions, those that are not xx/xy. what do we label them. as they would have to create another category. which went against what they believed.

if you think there's only xx/xy you are so wrong.


semp

That's not my arguement. Do they have organs to produce a baby or not? If they do not, than they are not a woman.

That is my argument.

Well said Semp. I wonder if a society that didn't judge others and minded their own business might work?

That's all fine and dandy until they A. Tried to insert themselves in woman's activities stealing opportunities from real woman. B. Tried to force businesses to change their bathrooms. C. Put it in l of our movies. Its almost like they can't mind their own business...

Remember, we've gone from gay marriage to "children should be allowed to have sex changes" all in less than 15 years.

[Lazerr]

That is "pretty simple".

Its good to know that friends, moms, grandmothers, perhaps somebodies wife - or any other woman that ever contracted some form of Cancer, or Uterine/ Cervical issues requiring a radical hysterectomy, are not considered women.

Are you being serious?   

Did you read the "at birth" section?

[guncrasher]

That's not my arguement. Do they have organs to produce a baby or not? If they do not, than they are not a woman.
.

what do you call a woman that was born without reproductive organs but no male sex organs.

semp

[Busher]

That's all fine and dandy until they A. Tried to insert themselves in woman's activities stealing opportunities from real woman. B. Tried to force businesses to change their bathrooms. C. Put it in l of our movies. Its almost like they can't mind their own business...

Remember, we've gone from gay marriage to "children should be allowed to have sex changes" all in less than 15 years.

How be these issues get dealt with on a case by case basis; and while it's so easy to be judgemental, how would you like your life and your family's life under a microscope?

[RUSH1]

I blame Klinger on MASH for starting the whole thing lol

Eagler

 

[RUSH1]

Remember, we've gone from gay marriage to "children should be allowed to have sex changes" all in less than 15 years.