Author Topic: E vs C  (Read 4204 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
E vs C
« Reply #240 on: January 25, 2002, 01:03:04 PM »
hblair,

I was quoting Kieran on the "NAIL HOLE" thing. I have no clue which verse it is, or if one even exists. Sheeesh!
Read the post for its meaning.

Offline hblair

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4051
      • http://www.cybrtyme.com/personal/hblair/mainpage.htm
E vs C
« Reply #241 on: January 25, 2002, 02:07:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
hblair,

I was quoting Kieran on the "NAIL HOLE" thing. I have no clue which verse it is, or if one even exists. Sheeesh!
Read the post for its meaning.


So, you're saying you're clueless?
Look here buster. Get your Bible facts straight or I'm gonna send mrfish and Amon over there to straighten you out.


:)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
E vs C
« Reply #242 on: January 25, 2002, 03:35:04 PM »
Thank God for Google....ooops:eek:

John 20:25 The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the LORD. But he said unto them, Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.

KJV

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
E vs C
« Reply #243 on: January 25, 2002, 03:39:52 PM »
PS hblair,

Hope you're enjoying Gods special effects trickery....making those stars look like theyare so far away and leaving all this tantalizing evidence for Evolution. That comedy jokester!

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
Close!
« Reply #244 on: January 25, 2002, 03:45:31 PM »
John 20:29

Quote
Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
even closer
« Reply #245 on: January 25, 2002, 03:52:25 PM »
the question was "which verse is it where Thomas is shown nail holes"

John 20:27
Quote
Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.


but my original post has been ignored by this attemp to change the subject....sad.

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
E vs C
« Reply #246 on: January 25, 2002, 03:54:07 PM »
What question is that? I thought you made some rhetorical remarks. Clarify.

Edit: Hey, I started the "Thomas" reference, I know what I meant by it. ;)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
E vs C
« Reply #247 on: January 25, 2002, 04:11:09 PM »
Quote
Welcome back Kieran. And how blessed are those who see that there may not NEED to be a God to explain the physical world and yet still believe.

And how disillusioned are those who see the evidence and chose to ignore it? Kinda like showing the nail holes to Thomas and having him insist its just special effects makeup.


hblair then wrote:
Quote
And how blessed are those who know what they're talking about. Which verse is it where Thomas is shown "nail holes" Target?


which had nothing to do with my post but started this attempt to find the right passage.

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
E vs C
« Reply #248 on: January 25, 2002, 04:12:07 PM »
Quote
And how disillusioned are those who see the evidence and chose to ignore it? Kinda like showing the nail holes to Thomas and having him insist its just special effects makeup.


If this is what you meant, I understood you. You were turning it around to imply believers see evidence and ignore it. Gotcha. I didn't think you were looking for an answer.

Now you realize of course, assuming you accept Jesus stood there with nail holes in His hands and a spear thrust in His side, it would be proof He was who He said He was? Let's not sidestep that issue. ;)

Anyway, I didn't throw that out there for the anti crowd, I meant it for HBlair. Point is, our sides are polarized and we aren't budging (you or me).

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
One minute apart!
« Reply #249 on: January 25, 2002, 04:15:25 PM »
Sorry, guessed what you meant and typed as you posted.

Offline hblair

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4051
      • http://www.cybrtyme.com/personal/hblair/mainpage.htm
E vs C
« Reply #250 on: January 25, 2002, 04:17:01 PM »
WTG Targy. You looked it up. Do you honestly think I would have posted that without knowing the scripture? I thought it was pretty obvious I was ribbing you.
Go take your place in the sad seat beside fish and Amon. Why do you guys get your panties in a wad so easily? Why do you feel you have something to prove?

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
E vs C
« Reply #251 on: January 25, 2002, 04:29:11 PM »
hblair......It was a joke?! (You DO think I know what I'm talking about?)


Please! My panties haven't bunched since....well a long time. I enjoy the heck outa this BBS and you have added to that enjoyment for me.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2002, 04:31:17 PM by midnight Target »

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4272
      • Wait For It
E vs C
« Reply #252 on: February 19, 2002, 02:49:15 AM »
....


hahah...  this funny urge overcame me and I couldn't resist!
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline Arcon

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
E vs C
« Reply #253 on: February 19, 2002, 09:37:13 AM »
In the beginning, there was nothing.

...

And it exploded.




I am trained as an engineer, where proof and logic and evidence are most highly "worshipped".  The worship of science and the worship of a Creator both require the same thing.

Faith.

Looks like we're really all in the same boat after all :)

For what its worth.

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
E vs C
« Reply #254 on: February 19, 2002, 11:53:53 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arcon
I am trained as an engineer, where proof and logic and evidence are most highly "worshipped".


 If you apply the knowlege of the laws of nature in your engineering work only as a matter of cultural/religious preference, I would not agree that you were trained as an engineer. As a priest of technology maybe...

 miko