Author Topic: Unglamorous, but neccessary  (Read 307 times)

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2002, 04:58:40 PM »
Quote
Bohemian transport, Transylvanian amphib


ROFLMAO, made my day!


NICE LIST banana!

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2002, 05:12:09 PM »
"B25H" OH Boy!! I can hear the whines now:

"Pyro, my 190 got hit by 5, 75mm rounds from a B25 today. EVERYONE knows that in WW2 a 190 could take 10-20 75mm hits."
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline Octavius

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6651
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2002, 06:26:58 PM »
LOL beef!  I agree banana 100%.  P40, P39, F4F, Stuka, He111, Kate, B25, Jill, Judy...

along with the Pam, joyce, liz, hellen, barb, janet, olga, helga, oh and dont forget Jenny... 8-6-7-5-3-0-niiieeeiiiiine...!
octavius
Fat Drunk BasTards (forum)

"bastard coated bastards with bastard filling?  delicious!"
Guest of the ++Blue Knights++[/size]

Offline gavor

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
      • http://users.senet.com.au/~shanga
Re: Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2002, 07:56:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by banana

I'm talking about Dive bombers, Torpedo bombers and level bombers.

Needed for Pacific theater: SBD, Helldiver, Val, Judy, Kate, Jill, B-25C, B-25H.




Nice list, but you forget Beaufighter, Buffalo and BOOMERANG! How many times must I stress the importance of this!

:)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2002, 08:48:18 PM »
Fast? Spitfire?  Same sentence?

banana, you must know something I don't because the Spitfires we have in AH certainly aren't fast.

There were fast Spitfires that were the contemporaries of most of the aircraft in the AH set, but we only have Spits from the first half of the war.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wanker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4030
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #20 on: March 07, 2002, 08:49:28 AM »
Quote
banana, you must know something I don't


:D



Quote
along with the Pam, joyce, liz, hellen, barb, janet, olga, helga, oh and dont forget Jenny... 8-6-7-5-3-0-niiieeeiiiiine...!


LOL Oct, that's too funny. You know a lot about music from the 80's for being such a young pup!


The only reason I didn't list more aircraft like the Beaufighter, Boomerang(lol), etc... is because the aircraft I listed above are just the foundation we'd need to move forward with the scenarios. And I left out fighter aircraft because I know those will come without having to beg for them. :)

I'm still trying to get Pyro to build an H8K2 Emily for us. That thing could bomb, torpedo and carry 64 troops! And it has 20mm defensive guns, tough armor plating.....could be the only perk floatplane you'd see in AH!

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17660
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #21 on: March 07, 2002, 09:21:54 AM »
V-1 Buzz bombs to destroy cities from afar :)
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti FTW3 | Vive Pro | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder Pedals

Offline MadBirdCZ

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
      • http://home.worldonline.cz/~cz088436/
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #22 on: March 07, 2002, 03:28:06 PM »
Schmetterling and Wasserfall  Surface to Air Missile sites for Strat. Target and HQ protection...

and of course an Avia B.534 :D

Offline gavor

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
      • http://users.senet.com.au/~shanga
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #23 on: March 07, 2002, 05:09:53 PM »
Quote
Boomerang(lol)


No laughing!

Offline Lephturn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1200
      • http://lephturn.webhop.net
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #24 on: March 07, 2002, 05:32:44 PM »
I don't think it's reasonable to intruduce all of any one type or nationality of aircraft in a release.  AH is made up of lots of folks, the majority of whom just want to furball in their favourity fighter I believe.  Any release that doesn't include at least a couple of new fighters wouldn't make sense if you think about it.

HTC has always had a really nice balanced approach to releasing new planes, and I don't expect that to change.

That said... I'd love the P-40, it's probably my most wanted ride at the moment.  The P-47-M/N needs to be the next perk.  A couple bomber type craft would be nice mixed in... :)

Offline MadBirdCZ

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
      • http://home.worldonline.cz/~cz088436/
Unglamorous, but neccessary
« Reply #25 on: March 07, 2002, 05:47:16 PM »
I think that most people are aware of HTC's strategy when it comes to releasing new airplanes. Problem is that all those people just keep on rumbling because they are ALL just chronic dreamers! :D

Well guys keep on dreaming....

And HTC - gimme that B.534, P-61, Buffalo, Stuka, Me-410, Beaufighter, ........  :D