Originally posted by Hortlund
Maybe you should answer his question instead thrawn.
From where Im sitting it looks like you painted yourself into a corner with that reply to Grun, and instead of taking back what you said you jump to plan b) personal insults.
What a stupid thing say. Your response is just about as idiotic as Gurns. Your statement is just about the most narrowminded, short sighted piece of drivel I've ever seen. It would seem that such post would come from the mind of a syphillic imbecile.
Indeed, the only thing with less thought put into it was Grun's sad excuse for a troll, where he majically takes my post about open mindedness/critical thought and though an amazing grasp of assine and innane logic to the conclusion that I support holocaust deniers.
I would expect as much from Grun, and am saddly reminded why I squelched him in the first place. It is somewhat bewildering that a would-be judge can't grasp something that appears so simple and self-evident. Perhaps they are so desparate in Sweden for judges that the ablility to actually reason is not a prerequiste, you think they could do better with all that tax money.
Anyways, this is more of response then either of you deserve.