Originally posted by straffo
X2Lee && CavemanJ I agree that the people oposing the view of the chicks can do what they want but my lecture of the event is different and more general.
Why should an artist be banned of every radio just because of a different opinion ?
If another opinion as no way to voice it's the instant the freedom of speach dissapear, you agree ?
The artist wasn't banned. The radio stations, after complaints from their listener base, chose not to play their music. I don't know how they run things in France, but this is free enterprise.
Case in point:
Dixie Chicks offend me, so I decide to boycott their music.
I call station A and B and tell them I'm boycotting Dixie Chicks.
Station B makes the decision to stop playing their music, due to listener calls.
Station A continues to play it.
I'm listening to station B.
If a business wants to make money, they follow their consumer. That's why boycotting works.
An artist has every right to voice their opinion, just like I do. They have to realize, that no matter what their opinion is, they are going to offend a portion of their listener base. If they choose to voice that opinion, they may lose a portion of their fans.
It's up to them to decide what is more important. Voicing their opinion and running the risk of reducing their earnings, voicing their opinion in a manner that is less offensive (many artists voice their opinions with less backlash, it was mostly the words she chose and the forum she said it in), or keep it to herself.
There is no wrong answer.