Author Topic: Vandalism (Read 1094 times)

Dowding · « **Reply #15 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:29:39 AM »

You seemed to be disagreeing with Straffo's assertion that there are A-holes in the US. What else did you mean by your post?

That banner was far more offensive than some vandalism of an inanimate miniture statue.

straffo · « **Reply #16 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:32:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by texace
Trying to pass the blame off on Americans is amusing...

Wrong interpretation of my post.

I just pointed it can be anyone even an american (even if it's not likely it's not impossible in theory)

texace · « **Reply #17 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:33:20 AM »

I was not disagreeing with the a-holes part. I said there are a-holes in America. I've seen the banners and I've seen the damage done by some protestors.

I was refering to the fact that he was trying to pass off the damage to American citizens...

Martlet · « **Reply #18 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:33:30 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dowding
You seemed to be disagreeing with Straffo's assertion that there are A-holes in the US. What else did you mean by your post?

That banner was far more offensive than some vandalism of an inanimate miniture statue.

I was disagreeing with his insinuation that an American student possibly defaced the 9/11 memorial. Pretty far fetched.

Dowding · « **Reply #19 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:36:16 AM »

I see. But if people are willing to promote the murder of their officers, surely they might also deface a 911 memorial? You've got to admit it's not impossible. Unlikely, true, but as Straffo says, not impossible.

straffo · « **Reply #20 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:38:10 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
I was disagreeing with his insinuation that an American student possibly defaced the 9/11 memorial. Pretty far fetched.

I disagree with your interpretation it's a french citizen who made that.

In fact I'll disagree until it's proven.

Martlet · « **Reply #21 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:38:28 AM »

Of course it's not impossible. It's far more than "unlikely" though.

Martlet · « **Reply #22 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:39:34 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
I disagree with your interpretation it's a french citizen who made that.

In fact I'll disagree until it's proven.

Of course you will, I expected no less.

Go stick your head back in the sand like a good little boy, Chirac will be along shortly to give you your next thought.

texace · « **Reply #23 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:42:57 AM »

Martlet: 1
straffo: 0

This is getting interesting...

straffo · « **Reply #24 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:45:23 AM »

It's more a 0/0 I don't take it personnal.

even with the sand comment which was ... "surprenant" and "incompréhensible"

Martlet · « **Reply #25 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:48:18 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
It's more a 0/0

Of course you think that, I expected no less.

I wish I could find a copy of the CNN interview with some french politician with a name I can't spell and a title to match. I'm sure he felt he held his own in that interview as well.

straffo · « **Reply #26 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:48:45 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Of course it's not impossible. It's far more than "unlikely" though.

What word should I have used so to translate "improbable" ?

straffo · « **Reply #27 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:50:12 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Of course you think that, I expected no less.

I wish I could find a copy of the CNN interview with some french politician with a name I can't spell and a title to match. I'm sure he felt he held his own in that interview as well.

How can you affirm I'm agreeing with him without knowing me ?

Martlet · « **Reply #28 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:51:47 AM »

agreeing with who?

straffo · « **Reply #29 on:** March 28, 2003, 09:52:30 AM »

oups misquoted I was thinking of Chirac.