Hey you are guy implicitly asking for a humnaitarion solution that would have killed far more people and far far more of them by proportion in far more greusome ways. But if you think that it would have been better that millions of Japanese civilans were shot in their guts by machine guns, or were burned by flamethrowers, or blown up by HE bombs, run over by tanks, stabbed with bayonets, threw themselves off of cliffs, were asphyxiated by fumes from fires, died of starvation, were executed by crazed Japanese soldiers, that childeren were ordered to charge tanks with bamboo sticks and satchel charges, that heads of households were issued a pair of hand granades one to kill an american soldier and the other to kill their families and so on then yiu have NO right to talk to me about hipocrisy.
On the other hand this attitude is entirely consistent with your ideas about the Iraq war, where you plainly considered it a better alternative for Saddam to stay in power indefinitely enslaving, impovershing, imprisonong, killing and torturing his own people by the tens of thousands each year than not to meantion threating the region than for the USA to intervene now in short decive targeted war with minimal civilan casualties.
Yea I see your morals clearly there.....