Author Topic: Score Stats for Okinawa (Read 2655 times)

Batz · « **Reply #75 on:** July 31, 2003, 01:36:32 AM »

Well you are both wrong. As I recall I dont remeber seeing either of yas in the CT prior to being CT CMS

Sabre · « **Reply #76 on:** July 31, 2003, 10:05:04 AM »

Your opinion is noted, Batz, and is given equal weight to everyone else's. There. No don't you feel better?

Sabre
CT Staff, Reserve

Seeker · « **Reply #77 on:** July 31, 2003, 06:40:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Oldman731
[B, I think that axis guys need a spit 9 equivalent to give to the ladies,
- oldman (wishing that he were flying instead of posting) [/B]

YOU WISH, JUG BOY!

Löwe · « **Reply #78 on:** August 01, 2003, 09:23:25 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Karnak

The best Japanese fighter, produced in huge numbers, was present in force at Okinawa and we don't have it. The N1K2-J is good, but it is a stand in for the Ki-84.

For some reason this simple fact seems to escape most people in late war PTO setups. Well put Karnak.

Arlo · « **Reply #79 on:** August 01, 2003, 12:16:05 PM »

Most? Are you sure?

Nwbie · « **Reply #80 on:** August 04, 2003, 12:34:13 PM »

not to disrupt the flow, but, I rarely fly in the CT, but I had a ball with this setup
Thanks CT team

NwBie