Author Topic: Freedom of speech?  (Read 311 times)

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
sand

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Freedom of speech?
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2003, 05:33:37 PM »
What was the charge?
Conspiracy is not protected speech BTW.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Freedom of speech?
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2003, 05:34:14 PM »
<<<>>>>


and your point is ??

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
Freedom of speech?
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2003, 05:36:44 PM »
That's great...can we prosecute Google now for returning results to a search for "homemade bombs"?


SOB
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline Inferno

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Freedom of speech?
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2003, 06:35:38 PM »
They should jail him for being a hippie if not for linking to sites that show how to make bombs. ;)

Offline Tarmac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
Freedom of speech?
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2003, 01:11:36 AM »
What did he do to set himself apart from the zillion other sites that have bomb-making info on them?

ELF doesn't seem too worried.  Still got their arson guide on their site.  
http://www.earthliberationfront.com/main.shtml

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Freedom of speech?
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2003, 04:27:52 AM »
"Austin said he took a plea bargain because he feared his case was eligible for a terrorism enhancement, which could have added 20 years to his sentence. The plea deal had called for him to serve four months."


This isn't the first time I've seen a story like this crop up in the media.  It's kind of a scary trend.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Freedom of speech?
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2003, 08:22:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
"Austin said he took a plea bargain because he feared his case was eligible for a terrorism enhancement, which could have added 20 years to his sentence. The plea deal had called for him to serve four months."


This isn't the first time I've seen a story like this crop up in the media.  It's kind of a scary trend.


Quote:
Quote
Austin told the judge Monday he "wasn't really thinking" when he created the Web site. "I'd be devastated if someone used this information to harm others," he said.


At least this guy can admit when he's not really thinking Thrawn...;)