Author Topic: AI 88's  (Read 6109 times)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
AI 88's
« on: July 26, 2004, 06:27:20 AM »


Whats the use of the AI 88mm puffy ack apart from infuriating people? Its so frustrating when you spend 10+ mins flying to a base to try and find a fight just to get 1 pinged from first salvo, 5 miles+ away from it by the computer?

Pay for this game to fight people, not the computer, if i wanted to fly vs the computer i would go play IL-2 :(

I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
AI 88's
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2004, 06:39:00 AM »
even better furball.......i was going past the port on the current map, err P39? (cant remember) its a bish port...It was in rooks hands. I started getting flaked by it, so i dived over the hill to the other side and had NO VIEW OF THE PORT WHAT SO EVER i was at 3-5k (7k hill) and the stupid port was still flaking me...and hitting me a few times?!!!!?!?!?!?! wtf? great code :rolleyes:
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10227
AI 88's
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2004, 07:34:41 AM »
We had 5 262s in the air the other Night. We lost 2 to the crap. I dont know what it is about puffy ack that Dale and the guys at HTC love about it so much but I have gotten to the point where when I see it I nose down and get as far away from the crap as posible. Even Last night ManeTMP got a pilot wound from the stuff flying no where near its source.
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.

Be A WARRIOR NOT A WORRIER!

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
AI 88's
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2004, 07:38:39 AM »
AI 88's should be much more effective vs. bomber formations, especially at CV's..  and much less effective vs. fighters.  in my opinion of course.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline TheDudeDVant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2429
AI 88's
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2004, 07:45:19 AM »
Ya.. I reported this bug before the last update..

puffy ack should be retired! It has kicked enough bellybutton in the MA.. Totally sucks to outfly everyone in a particular evironment just to die by some computer bs puffy, no rhyme or reason why it hits you, peeving players off to the extend of almost writing 'I quit' threads, bs 88 ack...

Does HTC consider puffy ack to add playability?? more lifelike?? a joke of HTC's to the MA??

Can we get a reason why the puffy ack hits you? Is it just an odds thing? The reason cant be because it gets close.. I have had puffs damn near inside my cockpit for no damage..

Offline Paxil

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://marathontoathens.blogspot.com
AI 88's
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2004, 08:01:07 AM »
I can't ever recall being hit by it.

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5708
AI 88's
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2004, 08:23:15 AM »
Make it a lottery shot with those AI 88's plez htc.
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
AI 88's
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2004, 08:28:42 AM »
I hate puffy ack, the stuff always nails me.
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline Polaris

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 85
AI 88's
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2004, 09:16:14 AM »
I think in the 7 years I've been flying WB/AH, I've been killed or damaged by flak MAYBE three times.

Offline kevykev56

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
AI 88's
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2004, 10:19:17 AM »
Would be nice to have the puffy ack as a manned gun....if you get killed by it manned it would be easier to take.

RHIN0
RHIN0 Retired C.O. Sick Puppies Squadron

Offline Mak333

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
AI 88's
« Reply #10 on: July 26, 2004, 10:35:11 AM »
bingo kevykev.  Same with the field ack, if people want to defend their base, go ahead, but dont put computers to substitute their lack of defensive skills.
Mak

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5708
AI 88's
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2004, 10:43:52 AM »
I disagree..Feild acks prevent/discourage vulching..What does AI 88's prevent/discourage??
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline Mak333

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
AI 88's
« Reply #12 on: July 26, 2004, 10:45:46 AM »
Vulching is a part of the game... If people wanted to defend a base, they would take up dweeb planes, GV's, and what else? ACK.  They would man the ack.

Having a computer do it for em is just stupid.

And no, ack does not prevent vulchers.
Mak

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
AI 88's
« Reply #13 on: July 26, 2004, 11:12:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
AI 88's should be much more effective vs. bomber formations, especially at CV's..  and much less effective vs. fighters.  in my opinion of course.


yup...fighters get blown out of the sky with ease, yet they are such a small target..... bombers however barely get pinged by flak, yet they are big and slow......... :rolleyes:

not saying it doesnt happen, i lost a JU88 the other day...flak blew the wing off :eek:

the fact that the AI 88s instantly reaim on a moving turning and alt changing target is BS.... In real life a formation of bombers may pull up 1000feet, and it would take the nme a couple of minutes (min 1 minute...) to work out they are missing, and how much by........ but in here, the ack instantly knows where you are going before you do it seems lol :mad:
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline YUCCA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 985
AI 88's
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2004, 11:21:33 AM »
I usually lose about 15-20% of my 262's to puffy ack :P