Author Topic: Gay Bishop Consecrated (Read 8290 times)

crabofix · « **Reply #60 on:** November 03, 2003, 06:40:26 PM »

Something with colours in peoples callsigns: They all end up on my ignore list.

Kieran · « **Reply #61 on:** November 03, 2003, 06:43:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crabofix
Now, here you can become a Bishop without beliving in God. I think I rather have a Beliving homosexual, then a nonbeliving Bishop.

His sin is between him and God, not between me and him.
The Goverment makes the Laws and if the goverment says, "homosexuality is legal" thats the way it is.

Or any of you object to who instates goverments?

What the state wants to do it can do. I have no problem with it. To use the cliche', I know gays, and only a few have ever caused me any problems. Just like all the other people I know. I would welcome gays into my church, just as I would any other sinner. I'm a sinner, too. Church is full of them.

What you guys may not realize is I would be just as much against an unrepentant adulter being a teacher, or anything else God called a sin. There is no pass on this one, this is one of the most important positions in the church.

Church isn't about compromise, or adapting to a society.

Sandman · « **Reply #62 on:** November 03, 2003, 06:45:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Kieran

Church isn't about compromise, or adapting to a society.

Gotta wave the BS flag on this one. The church is constantly adapting. How many different versions of the bible can you find?

crabofix · « **Reply #63 on:** November 03, 2003, 06:45:23 PM »

The church still needs to follow the laws, it does not stand over the law.
If theres something wrong with your laws, change goverment.

Eagler · « **Reply #64 on:** November 03, 2003, 06:48:24 PM »

wtg gay community!!!

does the good ole bish pitch or catch?

just another morality toilet flush on our road to ruin

sorry if I offended any of you homos out there

mrblack · « **Reply #65 on:** November 03, 2003, 06:50:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crabofix
The church still needs to follow the laws, it does not stand over the law.
If theres something wrong with your laws, change goverment.

They do thing differently in sweden.
Being as they have the highest teen suicide rate in the world.
There doing a great job.

Kieran · « **Reply #66 on:** November 03, 2003, 06:54:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crabofix
The church still needs to follow the laws, it does not stand over the law.
If theres something wrong with your laws, change goverment.

What are you on about? I never said homosexuality is against the law, I said homosexuals cannot be leaders of a Christian church. Besides, there are plenty of things that are not against the law a Christian is not allowed to do.

And yes, in Christianity religion is before the secular law. "Render unto Ceasar (I can never spell that right) what is his" means to follow societal law. It doesn't mean to change religious behavior to suit society.

Sandman-

Far better to look at the established religions, and how long they have existed.

crabofix · « **Reply #67 on:** November 03, 2003, 07:04:32 PM »

Kerian, I wont give you a historic lesson in church history, I do not think that it is called for.
And it is a bit diffrent in Europe, then in US, as you have had freedome of religion there, for a longer period then we.

200 years ago, going to church was not an option, it was an obligation here. But a lot of things have changed since thoose days. Fortunatly

Octavius · « **Reply #68 on:** November 03, 2003, 07:08:19 PM »

Mrblack, you are not capable of debate. Please refrain from posting any further.

If not, then feel free to carry on with the insults and immature tactics.

Frogm4n · « **Reply #69 on:** November 03, 2003, 07:17:32 PM »

so anything that tests one's faith is the work of satan right?

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #70 on:** November 03, 2003, 07:23:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
so anything that tests one's faith is the work of satan right?

As Abraham's faith was tested by God, obviously not.

Shuckins · « **Reply #71 on:** November 03, 2003, 08:10:17 PM »

MT,

Oh yeah! Sez you!

By the way, do you really understand all that scientific gibberish, or are you just extremely talented at finding these articles on the internet?

Here is a test. Without looking back at your article, define the terms listed below. If your score better than 70% on it you win a free tick to the next yearly convention of Queer Nation. Ready?

1. ectopic expression

2. mental rotation

3. Drosopila white gene

4. click-evoked otocoustic emissions

5. Drosopila melanogaster

_________________________

To be serious for a moment, if I understand the article correctly, the scientists are stating that the cochlea in the ears of women emit more echo waves than do those of men. Since the cochlea of homosexual males and females emit echo waves similar to those of women, this indicates that their brains' sexual orientation has been altered...correct? This seems to be a bit of a far-reaching conclusion to make based on these facts.

Regards, Shuckins

mrblack · « **Reply #72 on:** November 03, 2003, 08:12:07 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Octavius
Mrblack, you are not capable of debate. Please refrain from posting any further.

If not, then feel free to carry on with the insults and immature tactics.

Do I need to shut you down again Little man?
So what I don't like studmuffins get over it.

Frogm4n · « **Reply #73 on:** November 03, 2003, 08:14:19 PM »

I bet your fbcobra mrblack.

mrblack · « **Reply #74 on:** November 03, 2003, 08:15:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Frogm4n
I bet your fbcobra mrblack.

I bet you'r GAY:aok