Author Topic: More Americans Dead (Read 3944 times)

davidpt40 · « **Reply #45 on:** November 07, 2003, 01:36:24 PM »

Whats the probability of survival for bailing out of a helicopter?

Maybe our troops should be wearing parachutes.

Either that or get Chuck Noris to pilot our helos and have the crew bail out over the river as he heroically keeps it in the air (Missing in Action).

AKIron · « **Reply #46 on:** November 07, 2003, 01:42:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by kappa
AKIron wrote:
"I'm afraid I will trust nothing the French have to say on the subject as their objectivity is nonexistent"

Lmao.. that is SOOOOOOO ironic Iron... It seems I would say the same about u... The objectivity part that is....

k
AoM

How many lies do ya have to tell to be a liar? How many times do you poke your friend in the eye before he is no longer your friend. Maybe the answer is blowin' in the wind?

You called that site pro-American kappa. Please defend the two quotes I posted from your site.

kappa · « **Reply #47 on:** November 07, 2003, 01:52:49 PM »

AkIron wrote:
"How many lies do ya have to tell to be a liar? "

Please, objectively apply that rational to our president...

300 some odd American troops are dead as the result of presidential lies.

We are fighting a war with no forseeable end because our president lied to the american people...

Our national debt is more horenduous now than ever because of our president’s lies to the american people.

Kyote??

Peak Oil???

Oil for Blood from the Chenney-Bush Junta

Enron and Bush/Chenney energy policies....

Huumm.. ahh.. nevermind... nothing to see here.. move along...

k
AoM

AKIron · « **Reply #48 on:** November 07, 2003, 01:54:35 PM »

How about the defense of the quotes I call bull*****?

kappa · « **Reply #49 on:** November 07, 2003, 01:54:51 PM »

AKIron wrote:
"You called that site pro-American kappa. Please defend the two quotes I posted from your site"

How are those quotes anti-american? Please explain? Because they do not agree with you??

Patriotism my friend.. Look it up... 8)

k
AoM

Hortlund · « **Reply #50 on:** November 07, 2003, 01:56:10 PM »

Here nexus, kappa and airhead (welcome back btw)

Quote

Loving the Bush Haters
Is it wrong to take pleasure in the madness George W. Bush induces in his critics? Nope.
by Noemie Emery
11/07/2003 12:00:00 AM

I LOVE GEORGE W. BUSH. I worship the man. I wake up every morning glad he is president. When annoyed by small things--traffic, the weather, an overcharge--I say to myself, "President Bush," and at once feel better. I like his worldview. I like his dogs and his wife and his mother. I think he looks cool in his shorts and his t-shirts. But it isn't these things that make my heart flutter: It's that he drives the people I hate the most nuts.

The Germans created the word schadenfreude to describe the pleasure one might feel at the woes of one's allies, but no one has yet coined a word for the happiness that can come to a person when those who annoy him complain. Open the paper, and there they all are: the hard-faced women who refer to abortion as "choice," the soft-faced male writers who look a little too pampered, the actors, the artists, the faculty hotshots, the with-it, the urbane and the urban, the concerned, the refined, the sincere.

They are enraged that someone unlike them has power; enraged because they think he is dumb, and he always outsmarts them; enraged that he pushed back when the Democrats, backed all the way by the Supreme Court of Florida, flooded the state with lawyers after the 2000 election, armed with game plans to subvert the result.

Above all, they are enraged that they can't sell their wrath to the rest of the country, which calmly remains unenraged. So, they write the same book over and over (and buy it in job lots), write the same pieces over and over, and post the same things on the web. I read them all.

And in them I find a perverse satisfaction. If, as Churchill maintains, it is exhilarating to be shot at and missed, it is also enlivening to have your opponent empty both barrels, to more or less meager effect. I read Sidney Blumenthal's mournful account of the Florida recount. I read junior writers at policy journals proclaim with no proof they are smarter than Bush is. I read them all, and I wickedly grin.

I grin because I have been once where they are, and have stood in their sandals myself. Liberals insist Bush exists in their minds as a vast malign presence, a huge psychic drag on their consciousness. I know, I know--I felt exactly the same way about Clinton, back in l999. Shortly later, I was told by a dentist that during the eight year reign of the Clintons, I had been grinding my molars to dust. "I've been grinding my teeth less since Clinton left office," I said, thinking he'd think it was funny. He didn't. His office is on Capitol Hill, and his practice is filled with political people, all gnashing their teeth in a frenzy of outrage.

It's your turn, now, fellas. Grind on!

Noemie Emery is a contributing editor to The Weekly Standard.

Personally I think its hillarious to see nexus and kappa and airhead and the rest loose their sanity like this.

kappa · « **Reply #51 on:** November 07, 2003, 01:59:35 PM »

Hortland wrote:
"Personally I think its hillarious to see nexus and kappa and airhead and the rest loose their sanity like this."

As long as your happy... Makes me smile 8)

k
AoM

muckmaw · « **Reply #52 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:01:14 PM »

Kappa and Nexus=Same guy.

Gotta be.

Sixpence · « **Reply #53 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:03:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by muckmaw
Kappa and Nexus=Same guy.

Gotta be.

No, kappa can make a valid point w/o name calling.

muckmaw · « **Reply #54 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:07:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sixpence
No, kappa can make a valid point w/o name calling.

I don't know, six.

Their posts read almost identically.

*shrugs*

kappa · « **Reply #55 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:07:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by muckmaw
I don't know, six.

Their posts read almost identically.

*shrugs*

Lmao.. thats right buddy..

k
AoM

AKIron · « **Reply #56 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:09:09 PM »

Kappa, you wanna know whether I think you are a liberal or a conservative? Here are but a few defining issues. You can decide for yourself where you stand.

Liberal

1. Pro Choice
2. Gun Control
3. Increased government funding for social programs
4. Government sanction of same sex marriage
5. Reduced military funding
6. Rigid separation of church and state
7. No death penalty

Conservative
1. Pro life
2. Freedom to own firearms
3. Reduced taxes to allow EVERYONE to keep more of what they earn
4. No government sanction for same sex marriage
5. Strong military
6. Recognition of religion's role in founding of country
7. Capital punishment for cold blooded murderers

Of course this is only how I see it. I don't presume to speak for anyone other than myself. At least you'll know where you stand in my eyes.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #57 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:11:17 PM »

Hmm, theres issues on both sides I agree with and disagree with.

Does that make me a Libservative or a Conserveral?

-SW

AKIron · « **Reply #58 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:15:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
Hmm, theres issues on both sides I agree with and disagree with.

Does that make me a Libservative or a Conserveral?

-SW

Just makes you confused.

Sixpence · « **Reply #59 on:** November 07, 2003, 02:15:36 PM »

liberal = gun control?