Originally posted by humble
LOL....
1st i'm not a "nikki basher" I don't whine to anyone about what they fly....
As for "evidence" I just gave it to you. Turn rate at given speed and attitude is pure physics...A plane in vertical obilque turn (nose down) is fighting itself. Normally you'll see significant amount of seperation occure before the con begins to close the gap. The nikki is able to generate a very tight turn in this nose down vertical turn and maintain an enormous amount of E. It's "common Knowledge" that I think a huge majority of the MA vets would agree with. I'm not aware of any data that suggests that the Nikki was a quantum leap in aircraft design and capable of this kind of exceptional performance. It's simply a problem with the way the plane is modeled in AH...
As for "loving the nikki"....it's pretty common....especially amonst the ACM challenged.
Just because it's a common whine, that doesn't make it true. I really don't enjoy flying the N1K2 much, and I don't find them especially formidable to fight.
Maybe we can put this stuff to rest with a simple test. As I have shown elsewhere on the BBS, mass is the primary factor in a zoom climb. I have tested every fighter in the plane set and and the heaviest fighters always have the best zoom climb.
The test is simple, accelerate to 300 mph and adjust power to stablize at that speed. Cut the throttle and engage auto-climb. whatever altitude is achieved, subtract 100 feet to get the net gain. The N1K2 zooms up 1,175 ft. The Spitfire Mk.IX zooms up 1,075 ft. The P-51D zooms up 1,225 ft. The F6F-5 zooms up to 1,600 ft, with the P-47D-30 and F4U-1D right there as well. Even the Bf-109G-10 is hard pressed to exceed 1,100 feet.
This test tells me that the N1K2 is no better than any other type in its weight class.
So, what about zoom climb at max power? I did that too.
Same test as before, except I leave throttle at max power, WEP engaged. At 300 mph I engage auto-climb, and note altitude when climb stablizes (normal climb based on thrust alone). Results?
N1K2: 3,100 ft.
Spitfire Mk.IX: 2,725 ft.
P-51D: 2,750 ft.
F6F-5: 3,150 ft.
Bf 109G-10: 3,475 ft.
Again, I see nothing to indicate the the N1K2 is any different from where it should be based upon its mass and normal climb rate. Especially when the F6F-5 does slightly better.
My regards,
Widewing