Author Topic: more democrat hipocracy  (Read 2944 times)

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #30 on: November 17, 2003, 11:45:06 AM »
Do you ever research your information before you throw it up here to get laughed at?  Stop getting your data from OpEd pages.

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #31 on: November 17, 2003, 03:46:44 PM »
Quote
Rich, white, anglo-saxon, protistant...sporkting power ties... wealth... and christian values.... not necessarily moral values.


yet if we are poor, non-religious, and the only power we have is at the town hall meeting we're considered "trailer-park conservatives."

OH yea nexus you librals are so for the people.  

being conservative doesnt mean you're part of the christian right.


thats like saying if you are a libral your a tree hugging dope smoking hippie.

yet another example of libral hypocracy......bigits

Offline mietla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2276
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #32 on: November 18, 2003, 10:32:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
Yes he was... It ended with an acquittal.



Just like an OJ case. Jury nullification in both cases.

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #33 on: November 19, 2003, 03:59:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus
I laugh when Republicans speak proudly that the GOP is the party of Lincoln...


I laugh when a closet libral thinks all republicans are racists.  And when we support a minority cause they just bring up any past ill will they can think of.

Quote

Any one who knows his history, writing and speaches knows Lincoln was also a seperatist... he believed in colonization of blacks back to Africa...


return them to there homland...is that such a horendous idea did all of them have to go?
Quote


He did not want them running free in the north... nor did he want interracial marriages...


do you have any proof of this or are you ranting?
Quote

he did not believe in equal rights for blacks.... he was a politician...


oh i get it he didnt want to free the slaves at all to follow the peoples will
Quote

championing anti-slavery only after the abolishionist movement became large enough to be an influence in elections.


OH WAIT he did free the slaves cause the people wanted it...now i'm confused...did the slaves get freed or not.  did the people want this?
Quote

Rant... rant... rant... rant.... :aok


yea basically the rest sound like that rant rant rant unborn babys...more sterotypes that all of us want everyone to worship god.


here's one.....most republicans are pro life....but when a republican presidant commits troops to war all you hear about is all the babys that are being killed
« Last Edit: November 19, 2003, 04:01:43 AM by Gunslinger »

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #34 on: November 19, 2003, 08:29:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
do you have any proof of this or are you ranting?


Yes... I do!

From the mouth of Abe himself:
here's his speech at New Haven.
http://members.aol.com/jfepperson/newhaven.html

by the way the emacipation proclamation... only freed the slaves in the rebellious south.

"The War on Slavery
Lincoln signed a bill ending slavery in the Western territories in 1862. Some historians believe that economic as well as moral concerns prompted this decision. Lincoln believed the expansion of slavery would depress white wages."

"On Jan. 1, 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation freed all slaves within the Confederacy."

http://www.riverdeep.net/current/2000/02/front.180200.lincoln.jhtml

"Abraham Lincoln may indeed have believed that blacks should enjoy the same legal rights as whites. But he also believed that the freed blacks should enjoy them somewhere separate from whites. Lincoln therefore worked, even during the war, to ship freed blacks to colonies in Africa, the Caribbean, and South America."

http://www.lewrockwell.com/dieteman/dieteman50.html

The Republican party has never been a friend to the Negro, and in fact is not one today either.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2003, 08:32:52 AM by DmdNexus »

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #35 on: November 19, 2003, 05:14:23 PM »
Wonder what Lincoln was talking about when he used the phrase "...a new birth of freedom..."  in the Gettysburg Address?  

After all, he wanted to send all the blacks back to Africa.  Didn't he?

Shuckins

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #36 on: November 19, 2003, 05:20:40 PM »
Quote
The Republican party has never been a friend to the Negro, and in fact is not one today either


and the librals are?

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #37 on: November 19, 2003, 05:30:47 PM »
Is it a constant theme among liberals to post links to OpEd pieces as facts and proof positive?

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #38 on: November 19, 2003, 05:49:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
and the librals are?


According to the Republicans everyone who isn't a Republican is a liberal..... yah... I guess there's a few people in that group that would fit.

Your guess is as good as mine... if they are or aren't.

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #39 on: November 19, 2003, 05:51:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus
You guess is as good as mine... if they are or aren't.

According to the Republicans everyone who isn't a Republican is a liberal..... yah... I guess there's a few people in that group that would fit.


and according to you everyone who isnt libral is a racist bigot neo-nazi who just cares about saving unborn children and pushing rlegion down peoples throats.

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #40 on: November 19, 2003, 06:02:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
Is it a constant theme among liberals to post links to OpEd pieces as facts and proof positive?


That's a rather disingenuous comment comging from you, given how this BBS works... JBA is notorious for posting OpEds.. as well as a few others.

Just so I know what the rules are...

What would you accept as a "non OpEd" link?

If it's an original source... for example a transcript of a speech... is that an OpEd?

Or how about a link to a press release by the White House or from the congressional record a declassified CIA report

How about a link to a mainstream news media site reporting a court ruling with PDF files of the judge's ruling.

Or from a historian who's an expert on Lincoln and his many writings and political views.

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #41 on: November 19, 2003, 06:06:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
and according to you everyone who isnt libral is a racist bigot neo-nazi who just cares about saving unborn children and pushing rlegion down peoples throats.


As Reagan was popular for saying when Jimmy Carter would misspeak... "Ah there you go again..."

I only say that about the Republicans who promote Bushism and Rumsfeldianism

Chenny is actually sort of benign.. so is Powel.

Karl Rove is the Great Satan!

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
more democrat hipocracy
« Reply #42 on: November 19, 2003, 06:39:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus


If it's an original source... for example a transcript of a speech... is that an OpEd?  No

Or how about a link to a press release by the White House or from the congressional record a declassified CIA report  No

How about a link to a mainstream news media site reporting a court ruling with PDF files of the judge's ruling.  No

Or from a historian who's an expert on Lincoln and his many writings and political views.  Yes