Author Topic: British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?  (Read 4277 times)

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2003, 09:12:23 AM »
'All the Brits loved him'? That's a good one, lazs.

This chimp of a man doesn't have the balls to face an elected house of representatives in perhaps the only country in the world giving him any support. :rofl
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2003, 09:14:30 AM »
Quote
Oh sure, of course the Secret Service just fields armies of goons, thousands of them everywhere and in every country the President goes too.


They don't need to. The British police has fielded 20,000 police a large proportion of which are armed and no doubt plenty of British secret service personnel at cost to the British tax payer. Wonderful arrangement, eh?
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2003, 09:26:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dago
Oh sure, of course the Secret Service just fields armies of goons, thousands of them everywhere and in every country the President goes too.  Nexus, you write shxt that is so stupid and asnine as to make me convinced you are just a complete fxcking idiot.
dago


You're out of touch Dago... I guess that would make you the idiot for not knowing...

ACLU is suing the Secret Service and Dubya for violation of Civil Rights....

Several Courts have cited the Secret Service for Civil rights violations already...

You want the facts... here they are...

"protestor Brett Bursey and the press, police officers arrested Mr. Bursey for standing with thousands of Republicans welcoming the President at a Columbia, South Carolina airport because Mr. Bursey refused to change or put down his sign. Mr. Bursey reports he was told that if he wanted to protest the President, he would have to go to the designated protest site half a mile away near a highway and outside the sight and hearing of the President. "It's the content of your sign," officials said."

http://www.waifsandstrays.org/pers/archives/000162.html

ACLU lawsuit:
http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=13694&c=86&MX=959&H=0

here are the incidents for your stupidity...

Phoenix, Arizona
On September 27, 2002, President Bush came to the downtown Civic Center for a fund-raising dinner for two local candidates.  A coalition of groups opposed to a variety of the President’s policies, consisting of approximately 1,500 people, negotiated with the local police for a demonstration permit.  Phoenix police advised the protesters that the President had requested a federal protection zone.  These protesters were required to stand across the street from the Civic Center.  People carrying signs supporting the President’s policies and spectators not visibly expressing any views were allowed to stand closer.  Eleanor Eisenberg, director of the local ACLU, was present as a legal observer.  When mounted police in riot gear charged into the crowd without warning, Eisenberg, who was across the street taking photos, was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. The charges were later dropped.  

Stockton, California
On August 23, 2002, at an appearance in a local park to support a Republican gubernatorial candidate, protesters were ordered behind a row of large, Greyhound-sized buses, which placed them out of sight and earshot of their intended audience.  They were advised that if they went to the other side of the buses, a location visible to those attending the event, they would be arrested.  People who carried signs supporting the President’s policies and spectators not visibly expressing any views were allowed to gather in front of the buses, where event attendees could see them.  Local police told the protesters that the decision to force them behind the buses had been made by the Secret Service.

Evansville, Indiana
On February 6, 2002, Vice President Cheney was scheduled to appear at the local Civic Center.  John Blair, a local activist, walked back and forth on the sidewalk across the street from the Civic Center carrying a sign reading “Cheney - 19th C. Energy Man.”  When Blair stopped walking, he was ordered to move to a “protest zone” more than a block away from the Civic Center.  When he refused to do so, he was arrested.  Spectators or passers-by who did not express any views about the Vice President’s policies were allowed to walk on the sidewalk in front of the Civic Center. Blair, represented by the ACLU, successfully challenged the arrest.  But the lawsuit remains in force because the city has refused to acknowledge that it had no right to ignore Blair’s constitutional rights.

Kalamazoo, Michigan
At President Bush’s appearance at Western Michigan University on March 27, 2001, a protester was carrying a sign sarcastically commenting on the prior Presidential election (“Welcome Governor Bush”).   A Western Michigan policeman ordered him to go to a “protest zone” behind an athletic building located 150-200 yards from the parade route.  After the protestor was ordered to move, several hundred people who were not carrying signs congregated in the area where the lone protester had stood and were allowed to remain there.  The protest zone was located so that people sent there could not be seen by the President or his motorcade.  When the protester refused to enter the protest zone, but insisted on standing where other people had been allowed to gather, he was arrested.   Local police testified at his trial that the decisions had been made by the Secret Service.

St. Louis, Missouri
On November 4, 2002, one day before Election Day, the President came to the St. Charles Family Arena.  Two protesters carrying signs critical of the President’s policy on Iraq were ordered into a “protest zone” approximately one-quarter mile away, a location completely out of sight of the building.  When the protesters refused, they were arrested.  Meanwhile, protesters carrying signs supporting Republican candidates in the election were not ordered into the protest zone, were allowed closer to the President, and were not arrested.

On January 22, 2003, President Bush came to town to announce an economic plan.  Protesters carrying signs opposing the economic plan and criticizing the President’s foreign policy were sent to a “protest zone” located in a public park, three blocks away and down an embankment from where the President was speaking.  Neither people attending the event nor people in the motorcade could see the protesters in the protest zone.  One protester was arrested for refusing to enter the protest zone.  Standing near the location where the protester was arrested was a group of people who were not asked to move, including a woman who carried a sign reading, “We Love You President Bush.”  She was neither ordered into the protest zone nor arrested.  Local police told the arrested protester that they were acting at the direction of the Secret Service.

Trenton, New Jersey
On September 22, 2002, the President arrived to speak at a fundraiser for a U.S. Representative at the Sovereign Bank Arena.  There were 200-300 protesters who sought to protest around issues such as the war in Iraq and prescription drug policies.  They were told that they had to go to a protest zone that was set up in Parking Lot 5 of the arena, which is on the other side of a double-divided four-lane highway with barricades in the middle and high wire on both sides.  Some of the protesters walked around to the front of the arena where they observed pro-Bush demonstrators standing.  Protesters were told that the local police had to consult the Secret Service about the location of the protest zone.

Albuquerque, New Mexico
On April 29, 2002, the President came to a somewhat isolated hotel in town to attend a fund-raising luncheon for a local member of Congress.  Protesters opposed to the policies of the President, many carrying signs opposing the anticipated war in Iraq, were sent to a “protest zone” across the street from the hotel where the President was speaking.  People who supported the policies of the President were allowed to be closer to the hotel.  Other people were allowed free access to the hotel.

Neville Island, Pennsylvania
On September 2, 2002, protesters were sent to a “designated free speech zone” located on a large baseball field located one-third of a mile away from where President Bush was speaking.  Only people carrying signs critical of the President were required to enter and remain. Many people carrying signs supporting the President and his policies were allowed to stand alongside the motorcade route right up to where the President was speaking.  But when retired steelworker Bill Neel refused to enter the protest zone and insisted on being allowed to stand where the President’s supporters were standing, he was arrested for disorderly conduct and detained until the President had departed.  The ACLU of Greater Pittsburgh represented Neel and had all charges against him dismissed. Local police testified at his trial that the security policies, including the protest zone location, were dictated by the Secret Service.

Columbia, South Carolina
On October 24, 2002, the President was scheduled to arrive at the Columbia airport.  One protester, Brett Bursey, was carrying a sign opposed to the policies of the President two hundred yards from the hangar where the President’s plane was to arrive.   He was ordered to a protest zone over a half-mile from that location.  Several hundred protesters with signs that supported the policies of the President were allowed to stand closer to the hangar.  When Bursey insisted on being allowed to remain where other members of the public stood, he was arrested on state and federal criminal charges.  In May 2003, a group of 11 Congressmen urged Attorney General Ashcroft to drop the charges, saying that the government’s prosecution of Bursey was a mistake “and is in fact a threat to the freedom of expression we should all be defending.” To read the letter, go to http://www.house.gov/frank/scprotester2003.html

There's more... read the links.

It's been in the news... even FoxNews.

Offline Rude

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4609
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2003, 09:31:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
They don't need to. The British police has fielded 20,000 police a large proportion of which are armed and no doubt plenty of British secret service personnel at cost to the British tax payer. Wonderful arrangement, eh?


Bush loves the Brits....only country with the balls to do whats right.


Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2003, 09:31:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
so all the brits loved him and that is what is pissing off the little liberals dowding and darned nexus?   you can allmost feel the acid from their vitriol.   feels like..... warm rain.

lazs


Lazs do you live in a bottle of farts?

The Majority of Brits do NOT agree with Bush and Tony Blair.

Blair is under heavy opposition in Britain and will most likely not get re-elected.

Man are you neo-cons frothing at the mouth deluded zealots even when faced with irrefutable facts.

Brown shirts suit you guys well.... when are you handing out the Jack boots?

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2003, 09:45:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus

Brown shirts suit you guys well.... when are you handing out the Jack boots?


You talking to yourself again Nexus?

Quote
I'm right next to the Pope! Sheesh!

Economic Left/Right: 2.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.23



You're further right than Lazs! LOL!

Oh, and the ACLU has NO political affiliations or interests, do they? :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2003, 09:50:59 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Oh, and the ACLU has NO political affiliations or interests, do they? :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl


Everyone has political affiliations... so what. :aok

I admit I'm some time's a rigth winger...I even voted for Reagan - But only once! Jack Anderson was a little too radical.

At least the ACLU isn't goose stepping on people's freedom of speech like the Bush Administration is doing.

Offline Swager

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1352
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2003, 09:51:12 AM »
IF he is in UK for more than 4 days, they have to keep him, right?
Rock:  Ya see that Ensign, lighting the cigarette?
Powell: Yes Rock.
Rock: Well that's where I got it, he's my son.
Powell: Really Rock, well I'd like to meet him.
Rock:  No ya wouldn't.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2003, 09:52:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DmdNexus
Everyone has political affiliations... so what. :aok

I admit I'm some time's a rigth winger...I even voted for Reagan - But only once! Jack Anderson was a little too radical.

At least the ACLU isn't goose stepping on people's freedom of speech like the Bush Administration is doing.


That was John Anderson. I voted for him in 1980 ;)

No, the ACLU is doing the Stalin Stroll, not the goose step.

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2003, 10:18:02 AM »
Rip-

Could you do me a favor and not quote Nexus in your replies.

I caught a glimpse of his last purge and now feel I should fashion a tin foil hat for myself.

Thanks in advance!

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2003, 10:20:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Could you do me a favor and not quote Nexus in your replies.

I caught a glimpse of his last purge and now feel I should fashion a tin foil hat for myself.


Poor Muckmaw... he want's to be a monkey with his hands over his eyes and fingers in his ears.

He doesn't have the balls to listen to people who disagree with him... very much like that chimpanze G Dubya!

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2003, 10:22:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
That was John Anderson. I voted for him in 1980 ;)

No, the ACLU is doing the Stalin Stroll, not the goose step.


You are correct sir... my memory failed me... J. Anderson. :aok

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #27 on: November 19, 2003, 10:31:24 AM »
[Pee-wee Herman Mode on]

WHA?

I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!

LALALALALALALALLALALALALAL

[Pee-wee Herman Mode off]

I'm such an sweet child sometimes.

Offline DmdNexus

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #28 on: November 19, 2003, 10:43:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
I'm such an sweet child sometimes.


for once I agree with you! :rofl

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
British Anti-War Hippies....No Show?
« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2003, 11:22:30 AM »
Let see Nexus, first you post this:

Quote
Remember every where Bush goes... protestors are not allowed to be with in miles... the secret service is known for illegally arresting lawful protestors.


For proof, you offer this:

Quote
These protesters were required to stand across the street from the Civic Center.


and

Quote
protesters were ordered behind a row of large, Greyhound-sized buses, which placed them out of sight and earshot of their intended audience.


and

Quote
[a local activist, walked back and forth on the sidewalk across the street from the Civic Center carrying a sign reading “Cheney - 19th C. Energy Man.” When Blair stopped walking, he was ordered to move to a “protest zone” more than a block away from the Civic Center.   passers-by who did not express any views about the Vice President’s policies were allowed to walk on the sidewalk in front of the Civic Center


Seems simple, keep walking, even if protesting,  you are fine, if you want to stop and stand there, you gotta move on,  yeah, regular Nazi tactics

and

Quote
A Western Michigan policeman ordered him to go to a “protest zone” behind an athletic building located 150-200 yards from the parade route.



Sorry Nexus, but thanks for showing the fallacy of your orignal statement yourself:

Quote
protestors are not allowed to be with in miles...


Sure sounds like they are "within  miles" to me.

A couple of facts to consider:

a) They are allowed to protest
b) They aren't allowed to protest in a manner that prevents those who actually want to hear the President from doing so (imagine that, being forced to be considerate and not rude?)
c) Most of them want publicity more than anything else, and if the press cares to put them on, they can easily film or photograph them if they want to
d) Despite what James Carville thinks, preventing someone from completing a sentance by rudely interrupting does not make you a winner in an arguement, nor does it make you right.  

I strongly believe everyone has a right, and it could be said an obligation to protest policies you dont agree with, but there has to be limits on how, when and where these protests are carried out.  The protesters as a rule want to rudely disrupt speeches and appearances, earning scorn and disrespect from those they might wish to influence.  If they want be heard, find the proper forums.


And you are still a Downs Syndrome type.   :rofl



dago
« Last Edit: November 19, 2003, 03:53:44 PM by Dago »
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"