Author Topic: Lock-on (Read 9535 times)

maslo · « **Reply #45 on:** November 23, 2003, 03:42:08 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by MC_Honky
I'm already hearing from Lock-On community that the Mig29 dominates Online. Those UBI guys are having a ball with this I'm shure..can you imagine, "Oui Oui we'll show those American Cowboys , Oui Oui.. pass the Goose Liver."

may be you should blame HT, coz 262 dominate AH

anyway if you realy belive, that F15 is superior compare to mig29, bring some technical parameters.... and stop crying my little doll

Slash27 · « **Reply #46 on:** November 23, 2003, 05:28:10 AM »

as lopsided as indicated by the one improvised statistic you provided. Its closer to 150-0 in air to air. But now there's the F22 so piss on the Mig:D

maslo · « **Reply #47 on:** November 23, 2003, 08:06:06 AM »

LOL thats cool score

anyway we dont fear F22,coz Fool with a tool is still fool

im so looking for this game .... i hope it gonna be more stable that Falcon 4.0

MC_Honky · « **Reply #48 on:** November 23, 2003, 08:56:31 AM »

Have any of you followed the performance curve scandal that hit IL2? Well sombody figured out how to extract performance curves directely from IL2. The Russian planes had at least 20% "fluff" in them. I read a rather long post on Lock-On's BB by a F-15 mechanic complaining about how the F-15 was modeled during beta. He offered to help but they Eagle Dynamics didn't care.

Capt. Pork · « **Reply #49 on:** November 23, 2003, 09:11:24 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Slash27
as lopsided as indicated by the one improvised statistic you provided. Its closer to 150-0 in air to air. But now there's the F22 so piss on the Mig:D

THere's also the su-37, the s-37 forward swept flanker variant and the mig 1.44, all designed with the f-22 in mind as a rival.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #50 on:** November 23, 2003, 01:21:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MC_Honky
Have any of you followed the performance curve scandal that hit IL2? Well sombody figured out how to extract performance curves directely from IL2. The Russian planes had at least 20% "fluff" in them.

Yeah, and if you actually bothered to read it - you would of noticed it was the performance of the AI planes. And that "20%" fluff number you are throwing around is greatly exagerated.

Everytime you post about FB or Lock On, you prove you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
-SW

MC_Honky · « **Reply #51 on:** November 23, 2003, 01:38:31 PM »

OK ..OK ..AI planes only???? Why don't the German planes have this AI 20% "fluff" ?? Last time I checked the German planes can be flown by the computer ??

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #52 on:** November 23, 2003, 01:45:04 PM »

Like I said, that 20% is a complete exageration... and its only in climb rates.

Guess what? Certain angles produce certain climb rates - it wasn't even remotely close to a scientific test... just a quick run through with one set of inputs.

In any event, it doesn't matter with the AI since its all simplified calculations.

The only planes that really matter are the human flown planes since they are the ones that are supposed to match real world data. Using anything else to show a bias is a pathetic attempt at proof. But apparently it works on the simpletons.
-SW

MC_Honky · « **Reply #53 on:** November 23, 2003, 01:55:49 PM »

Oleg's pathetic attempt to model the P-47 is another example. Worst cockpit of all in plane-set. Roll pathetic, E-retention pathetic everything was secondrate on that plane.

It's like UBI told him, "Oui Oui- put an American plane in there so we can Milk these American cowoys."

and then Maddox was like, "I don't want to put a Yanke plane in ..Pass the Voka."

and then UBI was like, " Oui Oui-I understand ...but I didn't say you had to make it good..Oui Oui-Jerry Lewis is a bloated pig but I love him."

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #54 on:** November 23, 2003, 01:57:13 PM »

Man, you really are a handsomehunk.
-SW

Chairboy · « **Reply #55 on:** November 23, 2003, 02:29:39 PM »

That, and he only seems to know one french word, their word for yes. This is puzzling, as I suspect the word he hears most often in a social context is 'No'.

MC_Honky · « **Reply #56 on:** November 23, 2003, 03:38:29 PM »

AKwulfie your just anrgy that you can't defend Oleg and Crew.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #57 on:** November 23, 2003, 03:41:12 PM »

I can't really defend a product against asinine accusations which aren't researched.
-SW

Capt. Pork · « **Reply #58 on:** November 23, 2003, 05:04:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MC_Honky
Oleg's pathetic attempt to model the P-47 is another example. Worst cockpit of all in plane-set. Roll pathetic, E-retention pathetic everything was secondrate on that plane.

It's like UBI told him, "Oui Oui- put an American plane in there so we can Milk these American cowoys."

and then Maddox was like, "I don't want to put a Yanke plane in ..Pass the Voka."

and then UBI was like, " Oui Oui-I understand ...but I didn't say you had to make it good..Oui Oui-Jerry Lewis is a bloated pig but I love him."

Right or wrong, your insulting little attitude takes away from the credibility of anything you say.

Pooh21 · « **Reply #59 on:** November 23, 2003, 06:06:22 PM »

How is the Su-25?

Mig29 would give it to the f15 in the arse in a turnfight. Thankfully IRL most migs are flown by skilless dweebs.