Author Topic: Name This...(698) (Read 789 times)

pugg666 · « **Reply #1 on:** December 03, 2003, 07:33:26 PM »

Sd.Kfz.251 with, hmmm 20MM

ausf D

csThor · « **Reply #2 on:** December 04, 2003, 06:16:58 AM »

SdKfz 251/17 (Ausf. D) with 2cm Flak38

Pongo · « **Reply #3 on:** December 04, 2003, 10:23:20 AM »

Good perk vehicle. Only takes 5 troops so you would have to take them in pairs

frank3 · « **Reply #4 on:** December 04, 2003, 10:39:45 AM »

Then how the hell did they crank up those 10 troops in our M-3?? as far as I know it also carries 5 troops (not in ah)

pugg666 · « **Reply #5 on:** December 04, 2003, 12:23:01 PM »

A perked halftrack? No way, thin armor (max of 15 MM on the D model), single 20mm with only 600 rounds IIRC.

brady · « **Reply #6 on:** December 04, 2003, 12:23:14 PM »

Sdkfz 251(D), it is:)

I beleave it is a late Model 251/17, mit 2cm KwK 38, but the gun doesent look quiet right to me it looks like a MG 151.

pugg666 · « **Reply #7 on:** December 04, 2003, 12:28:23 PM »

ya and the /17 had a armored shield as well

brady · « **Reply #8 on:** December 04, 2003, 01:29:13 PM »

Some of them did and some dident, I have sean picturs with the shield off and later models had a different gun mount, whear the sides dident fold down, kinda like the pick above, the thing about the pick above is the gun mounting and the gun it's self.

Pongo · « **Reply #9 on:** December 04, 2003, 03:19:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by pugg666
A perked halftrack? No way, thin armor (max of 15 MM on the D model), single 20mm with only 600 rounds IIRC.

Its not that its invulnerable. It is fast and well armed and can take a base. Why not perk it?

pugg666 · « **Reply #10 on:** December 04, 2003, 04:12:50 PM »

Quote

Its not that its invulnerable. It is fast and well armed and can take a base. Why not perk it?

it's neither fast nor well armored, I agree nice gun with a good amount of ammo.

Top speed is 53 K/hr, 32-33 M/hr onroad and 10K/hr, 6 M/hr offroad(I seriously think the offroad speed is a mistake) . So, considerably slower than the M-3.

A maximum of 15 MM of armor would make it very vulnerable, even to 7.92 MM and .30 cals.

Open topped and no room for troops,what with the gun mount and amunition storage.

I still don't see why it would be perked.

Pongo · « **Reply #11 on:** December 04, 2003, 04:42:12 PM »

Because with that armement the M3 totaly goes out of use if that vehicle is introduced. Think of what the game is like if every M3 has a gun on it considerably better then a Hispano. It is better defended then an M3 as well. Plus its grunts are armed with Mp44s and Panzerfausts..

pugg666 · « **Reply #12 on:** December 04, 2003, 04:55:41 PM »

why not use an ostwind instead, better gun with more ammo, same speed, same lack of troops, better armor.

a bit more info on it

http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/pit/3515/251/251-17.htm

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/3620/251_2cm.htm

Soulyss · « **Reply #13 on:** December 04, 2003, 05:21:51 PM »

am I the only one who loves how any post on any vehicle/plane/boat/whatever gets turned into a perk/not-to-perk debate?

Pongo · « **Reply #14 on:** December 04, 2003, 05:35:34 PM »

Look at my first post. That you replied to. I said with troops.