Originally posted by Holden McGroin
It continues to amaze me that there are those who are absolutely convinced based on highly questionable evidence.
If any one else had made this comment it simply would not be as completely hilarious as it is. ROTFLOL!
Thanks Holden...I needed a good laugh. I think I would like to put this as a quote in my sig, if you don't mind.
I wonder why you never made a comment like that aimed at the Bush Administration when they became so convinced, based on shoddy evidence, that they started a war.
As far as Bush's drug/alcohol use...why won't he answer the question? When asked if he ever cheated on his wife, he gives a resounding unmitigated "NO". When asked about whether he's ever used illegal drugs, he begins to sound like Clinton asking what the definition of what "is" is. In '94 the Houston Chronicle asked him about past use of illegal drugs and he aswered, "Maybe I did, maybe I didn't." WTF! When the UK paper "Scotland on Sunday" asked if he's used pot or coke before he said, "When I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible." Does this guy ever give a straight answer?
So if he wasn't a cokehead and drunkard, why not answer the questions? If he was, why obfuscate...why doesn't he take responsibility for his past actions like a man?