Dago: No, you said you have a problem with opposition to slave labor. This would indicate you are in favor of slave labor.
It ment "My only problem with this mars exploration is the general oppositions to all projects built or funded through slave labor."
I may not be very punctual while typing fast and Englist is not my native language but I am sure it is obvious to anyone - especially to people familiar with my earlier posts.
If you have to resort to a typo to attribute a support for slavery to me - which would be contrary to a point I was trying to make in this argument - it just shows your level of maturity.
Oh, so glad to hear I am the only who makes personal attacks, yet you fail to address or answer my statement. Typical.
I said "It sounds almost like an admission" - which is a qualifier that satisfies the requirements of politeness.
You said my arguments were too obscure and confusing to you. That is an indication that you may be out of your league. Not every issue may be explained in two words.
Quite a bold lie that one. You often dont bother to explain why you think someone fails to understand.
I only have limited time, so when i am explaining a matter to one person, it can hardly be held against me that I am not explaining something to another person. Especially if such an issue was already covered in my previous posts. Surely, a person seriously interested in explanation is expected to do some search and reading. If he does not, why should I prefer him to someone with a more fresh issue?
Telling them they dont understand the issue is doing just that. You told me I dont understand money. Damn funny, specially considering you know nothing about me, know nothing about my background
I base my opinion on what I read here that you post. I believe you do not understand about money. So what? Why do you find it so offensive? Even if I am incorrect?
Well thank you for acknowledging my suspicion. You are simply parroting Libertarian views taken from a newsletter.
OK, you claimed that libertarian views are based on the conspiracy theories. When I countered that obvious nonsense, you said that it confirms your opinion that I am saying the same things that libertarian sources. Does it mean you were aware that libertarian views are not based on conspiracy theories? Then why did you claim otherwise?
Also, you are acting as if I am hiding my libertarian views. Damn right I am a libertarian an I read a lot of libertarian books and other sources. I've also read many anti-libertarian books like Keynes' "General Theory", Capital, Mein Kamph, The Federalist Papers, etc.
I study the wrong views as carefully as the right ones - how they originate, why they hold such an influence over people.
The USA is the sum of it's whole. When you attack the government, you attack the leaders the people have chosen to represent them.
So what? At no point in the last decade was the government elected by more that a quarter of the electorate. And even if it was elected unanimously, why woudl it be wrong to criticise the government - this particular one or the very concept of totalitarian government in general?
it's a fundemental right and responsibility necessary to keep us free and to retain our rights. But you dont do that.
Retain our rights from infringement by the government. So by illustrating how they are increasingly infringed, I contrubute as much as anyome can hope to preserving them.
miko