Author Topic: *****in Camaro (Read 749 times)

FUNKED1 · « **on:** January 14, 2004, 03:17:04 PM »

Video

Pooh21 · « **Reply #1 on:** January 14, 2004, 04:43:58 PM »

The La7 is AH equivelent of the 80s red camero

Creamo · « **Reply #2 on:** January 14, 2004, 04:51:43 PM »

They looked like they were towing a plow.

midnight Target · « **Reply #3 on:** January 14, 2004, 05:24:54 PM »

Looked like driver error....

RightF00T · « **Reply #4 on:** January 14, 2004, 11:04:14 PM »

Speaking of Chevrolets..anyone know the name of the Yellow truck/car thing that pulls a reverse at 60mph onto a car hauler in the Chevy commercial. 2004 El Camino? lol

WldThing · « **Reply #5 on:** January 15, 2004, 12:23:42 AM »

Quote

Speaking of Chevrolets..anyone know the name of the Yellow truck/car thing that pulls a reverse at 60mph onto a car hauler in the Chevy commercial. 2004 El Camino? lol

Chevy SSR.
Starting at $41,995*

Part roadster. Part pickup. A vehicle that transforms from a fully-enclosed roadster to convertible in less than 30 seconds.

Standard features include an aluminum-block Vortec 5300 V8 engine with 300 horsepower, ZQ8 Sport Suspension with a five-link layout for the rear and four-wheel disc brakes with ABS.

Lazerus · « **Reply #6 on:** January 15, 2004, 06:30:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by WldThing
Chevy SSR.
Starting at $41,995*

I've seen three so far. All of em about 46k. Pretty tight little truck. I didn't think I was going to like it until I got up close and sat in one.

gofaster · « **Reply #7 on:** January 15, 2004, 07:55:21 AM »

He missed a shift! He missed a shift!

gofaster · « **Reply #8 on:** January 15, 2004, 07:56:57 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lazerus
I didn't think I was going to like it until I got up close and sat in one.

You've gotten closer to one than I have, then. The only one I've seen up close and in person was the purple mock-up at the auto shows. It was up on a platform with a model babe acting as security to keep people from touching the paint.

AcId · « **Reply #9 on:** January 15, 2004, 08:34:28 AM »

SSR is pretty sweet, for a while I couldn't decide on which to get. It was either wait for the SSR or buy my current truck. I'm glad I bought what I did. I wouldn't be able to have this kind of fun in an SSR.

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #10 on:** January 15, 2004, 11:14:37 AM »

Nothing "little" about the SSR. Almost 5000 lbs worth of road-whale (road-sloth?) and room for only two people and not much cargo. Worst space efficiency I have seen from GM, and that is saying something. A sign of impending doom for the domestic auto industry.

PS Acid as much as I dislike the H2, you made the right choice, big time.

J_A_B · « **Reply #11 on:** January 15, 2004, 03:15:30 PM »

The saddest part of all is GM used to the opposite, Funked. My 1990 Caddy has a mammoth interior (the BACK seat has more legroom than most cars FRONT seats), yet the car weighs in at a rather modest 3400 pounds. This is comparible to something like a Subaru WRX, which has considerably less space for its occupants and still weighs better than 3000 pounds.

For additional comparison, a Ford Taurus weighs within 100 poinds of my Cadillac (a little over 3300 for a Taurus), yet is a much smaller car inside. Heck, the poor Ford doesn't even get the V-8 that my Caddy has to lug around....that probably explains most of the weight difference.

Where is that weight going? I have nothing against large cars, if there's a POINT to it.....however, too many new designs seem to be gaining weight for absolutely no reason. I swear, the domestic automakers (especially GM) are determined to run themselves into the ground. Weight-gaining and price inflation aside, most of the newer models are butt-ugly too.

J_A_B