Sure to make the Frogs 'hopping' mad

[Spooky]

Originally posted by Saintaw
LOL Spooky, show em a picture of your shirt, I think you'll scare BigBaldingMaw even more than he is now

(hint: Spooky...big dude)

I'm not big, I'm big boned dammit ! ------@Cartman, inc

lost that pic, too bad : that shirt was so awful, it was considered a WMD, had to ship it to Syria...

[Fariz]

Just for your information, almost any country that has nuclear weapon can make life impossible on the Earth just by blowing all its bombs on the own territory. Who need rockets?

Logic which can be used for a conventional weapon hardly apply to the nuclear one. Humanity is still resembles a man who is smoking sitting on a powder barrel. Now the threat is less than it was during the cold war, but who knows what it will be in 10 years?

[Capt. Pork]

Originally posted by Fariz
Just for your information, almost any country that has nuclear weapon can make life impossible on the Earth just by blowing all its bombs on the own territory. Who need rockets?
 

That's just not true, Fariz. Modern Nukes, as powerful as they may be(and the French don't yield any outside of the 300 KT range), put out far less radiation than they did during the 40s and 50s. Nuclear testing in Bikini alone, to say nothing of the 20-50 KT monsters the Soviets tested in Siberia, amounted to dozens of times the total yield the French have at their disposal. Is the world uninhabitable today? The fact is, radiation from thermonuclear explosions dissipates very quickly. Even Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were victims of very inefficient weapons, were down to very livable levels of radiation within the weeks. Melting down a nuclear reactor would acomplish the goal of poisoning the atmosphere much quicker, as was proved at Chernobyl.

As far as the French using SLBMs, it's possible, but not probable that they'd do it with much success. They have 5 missile boats, the missiles themselves possessing a range of 4-5 thousand Kilometers.  In a wartime situation, those 5 boats would be inundated by dozens of faster, quieter attack subs before they ever got into position. Super Dupont would have a better chance against the US navy.

Rediculous scenarios aside, any nuclear exchange would signal a time of dangerous desperation from which humanity would have a poor chance of surviving--not necessarily from the immediate death and destruction, but from the world-wide depression that would come afterwards.

Superman knew this, and acted on it in 4.

[Chairboy]

I don't think he was suggesting that the world would be at danger of being overwhelmed with radiation, I believe the danger is nuclear winter which is created by topsoil being deposited into the upper atmosphere and reflecting sunlight.

[GRUNHERZ]

Originally posted by GScholz
Actually Capt. Pork it is the low yield fission weapons that are the most "dirty", a fusion bomb is in fact a clean weapon except for the small fission trigger bomb needed to start the fusion process. France's nuclear arsenal is very dirty.

How very unelightened of them...

[straffo]

not really strange GRUN

when you are small you have to bite harder.

[Capt. Pork]

Originally posted by GScholz
Actually Capt. Pork it is the low yield fission weapons that are the most "dirty", a fusion bomb is in fact a clean weapon except for the small fission trigger bomb needed to start the fusion process. France's nuclear arsenal is very dirty.

I'm aware of all this Scholz. I suppose mentioning thermonuclear testing was off the subject. What my point should have been was that even given their fission arsenal, the amount of releasable radiation has already been aired into our atmosphere many times over. Testing during the hieght of the cold war(during which time hundreds of smaller fission bombs were detonated everywhere from upper atmosphere to surface to under ground and under water), as well as the Chernobyl meltdown(which has rendered the entire area surrounding the city uninhabitable for centuries--something nukes cannot do), has already accounted for substantial radioactive pollution. Yet we are still alive and the the average life expectancy of most 1st world countries continues to go up.

The nuclear winter problem, however frightening, would most likely not effect the entire hemisphere. All of Europe and Scandinavia definitely, but North American would probably be spared direct effects.

Anyway, I seriously doubt that the French, or anyone, would resort to bombing themselves merely because they lack sufficient delivery systems to hit us directly. Like I said, nuclear weapons, as a concept, represent a frightening desperation. There is no way they can be used in anger and not effect the entire world, radiation or not.

[Duedel]

Originally posted by BGBMAW
so france dosent have sheite that copuld hit the us,,,I can guarentte the frenchies could not get a nuclear missle to the USA with out being squashed first...there submarines..ya we know where there at..planes?? please they dont have stealth....ICBM..nope..dotn got them...

Looks like we wont be "losing our Balls"...lolol


thats good..
 

btw i think freance suxcs ..they sold illegal weopons to Saddma.the are willing to make profits over our blood.......I Do not support frech products...Not until the citizens demand accounatablity of there govs and wepaons sellers..."like when we sold chem/bio to Iraq in 85"..god that was dum




lets just quote a Marine in Kuwait...


Love
BiGB
xoxo

It always amazes me that life-forms with only one brain cell are able to open an BBS account.

[BGBMAW]

france......There always there when they need us......






FOUND IN IRAQ...FRENcH MADE ROLAND 2 MISSLES...........

they brought down atleast 1 a-10

http://www.warriorsfortruth.com/iraq-weapons-violations.html

never seen this web site before..i jusyt did a search with this as the criteria....."cheese eat'n surrender monkies illegal weapons in iraq"

or somthn close to that..lololo

now before your panties get all bunched up..i understand not all of france has access to sell wepons...AND..they said France has a large blackmarket ...so...blah...


btw...Fr4ance has VERY LARGE finacial debts in Iraq..NOT TO MENTION your boy Jak Chiracass  was Sodoms Homboy....not only hooked them up with nuclear "energy" equipment..Thank god Isreal Squashed that...

BUT the impotent UN and French banks held the money for Iraq'"oil for food program"  whicjh made them BILLIONS in interest alone...


so ya france you get what u deserve now and later...


and i still believ our Navy would crush the french subs...
ooohh are we really the only country that has succesfully MULtiple times intercepted incoming missles?


and go stab your self if u cry about my typing..im onehanded
keep on coming with the name calling to...lolol  you so cool they should call u culo's

next................


love
BiGB
xoxo

"France ...there always there when they need us"....lmfao...thats funny

[straffo]

not worth a post

[Spooky]

Originally posted by BGBMAW


FOUND IN IRAQ...FRENcH MADE ROLAND 2 MISSLES...........

Another fox news lie, I'll make the rebuttal short, I know the average Fox news viewer attention span is short...

Poland: French missile report incorrect  
By BEATA PASEK
Associated Press Writer

October 4, 2003, 3:08 PM EDT

WARSAW, Poland -- After a protest from French President Jacques Chirac, Poland said Saturday it had been mistaken in reporting that its troops found new French-made anti-aircraft misiles in central Iraq.

Chirac swiftly denied selling Iraq weapons in violation of the U.N. weapons embargo imposed against Saddam Hussein's regime in 1990. The claims, he said, "are as false today as they were yesterday."

An aide to the Polish prime minister said an initial report that the Roland missiles found by Polish troops days ago were produced in 2003 was incorrect. France said it stopped producing any type of Roland missile in 1993.

Prime Minister Leszek Miller met with Chirac twice to explain the mistake, said the aide, Tadeusz Iwinski. The two leaders were in Rome on Saturday for a European Union summit.

"There can be no 2003 missiles since these missiles have not been made for 15 years," Chirac told reporters in Rome. "Polish soldiers confused things. I told ... Miller so frankly -- friendly but firmly."
------------------------
and, had Iraq been equiped with recent French anti-aircraft missiles, more than one Coalition warplane would have been destroyed.

FYI, any weapon purchase ever made by Iraq over the years has been payed with US dollars (who do you think financed Saddam when you guys thought he was the best defence against Iranian islamists ?), and US approval, covert or not.

so, again :

[Chairboy]

Regarding nuclear winter, Carl Sagan wrote that it is 1. A worldwide situation, it can't be limited to a certain area, and 2. can be triggered by the detonation of as few as 100 nuclear explosions in close succession.

[Cerceuilvolant]

Originally posted by Spooky
Another fox news lie, I'll make the rebuttal short, I know the average Fox news viewer attention span is short...

Poland: French missile report incorrect  
By BEATA PASEK
Associated Press Writer

October 4, 2003, 3:08 PM EDT

WARSAW, Poland -- After a protest from French President Jacques Chirac, Poland said Saturday it had been mistaken in reporting that its troops found new French-made anti-aircraft misiles in central Iraq.

Chirac swiftly denied selling Iraq weapons in violation of the U.N. weapons embargo imposed against Saddam Hussein's regime in 1990. The claims, he said, "are as false today as they were yesterday."

An aide to the Polish prime minister said an initial report that the Roland missiles found by Polish troops days ago were produced in 2003 was incorrect. France said it stopped producing any type of Roland missile in 1993.

Prime Minister Leszek Miller met with Chirac twice to explain the mistake, said the aide, Tadeusz Iwinski. The two leaders were in Rome on Saturday for a European Union summit.

"There can be no 2003 missiles since these missiles have not been made for 15 years," Chirac told reporters in Rome. "Polish soldiers confused things. I told ... Miller so frankly -- friendly but firmly."
------------------------
and, had Iraq been equiped with recent French anti-aircraft missiles, more than one Coalition warplane would have been destroyed.

FYI, any weapon purchase ever made by Iraq over the years has been payed with US dollars (who do you think financed Saddam when you guys thought he was the best defence against Iranian islamists ?), and US approval, covert or not.

so, again :

I believe we call this le pwnage  in French.

[miko2d]

"Who is not with us is against us" - a slogan of russian communists that US seems to be adopting.

 France refused to go along with some lying US government scheme and now americans are speculating how hard can the french nuke us?

 miko

[rogwar]

What's the big deal about a war with France? Would they not surrender soon after a few fireworks?