This is intellect?
This is reasoning?
You don't think you insulted Drei?
You're full of yourself, you don't have the courage to admit you feel the whole 9-11 event was a total conspiracy by our government, and you cannot bring yourself to admit you are being smashed by people such as Drei and Tilt who obviously do have a fair amount of expertise in their respective areas and aren't relying on the words of others (aka fringe websites) to shore their arguments.
My comments to you stand, and you will be outed. I know you hoped to build an unstoppable case based on logic, but it can be boiled down to simply these two cases:
A. Bombs were used to destroy building #7. If so, this means whoever planted the bombs knew of the 9-11 attack beforehand, and only the government could have. If they had been terrorist bombs (something you've already hinted you believe were domestic terrorists) it would still require govenment involvement. Any way you slice it, if #7 was rigged, the government was involved.
B. In an event unprecedented in history, two airliners collided with the two tallest man-made structures on earth, and the results were catastrophic and not wholely predictable by physics. Too many factors were involved to ever fully calculate to an absolute degree of certainty what the results should have been, or exactly how the events should have occured. As a result, we don't fully understand what happened for sure.
Which is more plausible... which one...
Look, I'll stop when you finally grow a pair and come out and admit you believe the Bush administration was behind the attack. Or directly deny you believe it. Halfway crap and saying "I don't know, I don't know" won't cut it, because the story you are trying so hard to sell has no other possible ending.