Author Topic: Impeach Bush.... are they serious?  (Read 1579 times)

Offline Horn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #15 on: February 23, 2004, 11:53:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Giving no-bid contracts to Haliburton (Chenney's former company).... which is now under scrutiny by the GAO for fraud.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This issue has already been dismissed as 90% spin.


The Pariot Act expires soon.  Relax, you only have to stay in hidig a little longer.




http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,912515,00.html

Yeah, Haliburton only pays him a million a year. I'm sure he's very objective.

and

http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-5144203.html

Many parts of the Patriot Act never expire.

Please try to keep up.

h

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12770
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2004, 11:54:37 AM »
Why was Monica brought into the spotlight? Did it have something to do with the accusation of sexual assault made by another? Yes, it did.

Why do some find it so easy to dismiss Clinton's lie about this as nothing more than a married man protecting his marriage? It seems to me that many believe that if they claim something to be true one more time than it is refuted then it becomes true by default. Believe what you want Nakhui, I'll not try to enlighten you any more on this subject.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2004, 12:01:28 PM »
I think you have to do something illegal to be impeached.  Incompetence is not illegal.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2004, 12:04:36 PM »
William Jefferson Clinton is a rapist and a  murderer.

So it is said ;)
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2004, 12:22:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Huh?


Clue #1
Justice Department launches criminal probe into leak of CIA operative's name
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/Iraq/2003/09/30/213369-ap.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/29/wilson.cia/
http://www.democrats.org/news/200309300001.html

Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Acting on may turn out to be bad information is not fabricating evidence.

Clue #2
Transcipt of Wolf Blitzer interview with Scott Riter, former UN weapons inspector.
http://www.why-war.com/news/2003/07/13/scottrit.html

US to probe Iraq war intelligence
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1036232.htm

Senator Feinstein Supports Independent Investigation into the
Pre-War Intelligence on Iraq and Its Use
http://feinstein.senate.gov/04Releases/r-iraqwmd2.htm

On top of the intelligence, the Administration was pounding a steady drumbeat of speeches and comments about the threat that Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction presented.  

Let me give you some examples:

President Bush, on September 12, 2002, said in his Address to the UN General Assembly: “Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.”  

President Bush, on October 2, 2002, said in a Rose Garden Ceremony: “The regime has the scientists and facilities to build nuclear weapons, and is seeking the materials needed to do so.”  

President Bush, on October 7, 2002, said in an Address on Iraq: “The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program….Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past. Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly-enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year.”    
President Bush, in his October 7, 2002, address also said: “We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, and VX nerve gas.”    

President Bush, on March 17, 2003, said in his Address to the Nation on War with Iraq: “Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.”  

How can this have happened?  Did the Intelligence Community fail, and why? Did senior policymakers misinterpret, manipulate or misrepresent the analytic product of the Intelligence Community? Did senior Executive branch officials deliberately mislead the American people and the Congress?


I know liberal press, biased media... etc. etc... etc....

Even though the justice  department is closing in on who leaked valerie palmer's name.

There are 2 congressional investigations and one special prosecutor investigation going on looking into the US Intelligence and policy makers' statements.

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2004, 12:22:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Duedel
strongest President since Reagan?

get a life...


Someone's still a little miffed that Reagan knocked down their wall.....

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2004, 12:24:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nakhui
C

There are 2 congressional investigations and one special prosecutor investigation going on looking into the US Intelligence and policy makers' statements.


I guess we have to boot everyone in Congress that voted for it too.  

There goes Kerry's campaign.

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2004, 12:30:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
Someone's still a little miffed that Reagan knocked down their wall.....



:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

:aok
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #23 on: February 23, 2004, 12:36:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saurdaukar
Yeah Eagler!  Get a life!  Only losers post about politics on message boards!


Ah and here you are posting about politics...  :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #24 on: February 23, 2004, 12:56:11 PM »
Quote
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?


As the President and the Congress are of the same political party those pushing for impeachment may be serious but they are far from realistic.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Heretik

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 596
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #25 on: February 23, 2004, 01:01:01 PM »
Go ahead and impeach him.  Whatever charges they come up with probably won't stick, so  I doubt very much he'd be removed.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #26 on: February 23, 2004, 01:04:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nakhui
Ah and here you are posting about politics...  :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


As are we all.  That was kinda the point Mr. Rolly Eye Guy.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #27 on: February 23, 2004, 01:04:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nakhui
Ah and here you are posting about politics...  :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


As are we all.  That was kinda the point Mr. Rolly Eye Guy.

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #28 on: February 23, 2004, 01:08:19 PM »
I am thrilled Nader is running again.  Not that I would vote for him, it's just a fantastic boost to the chances for a Bush relection.  

Nader cost Gore the election and for that,  we should consider ourselves forever in his debt.  But we sure don't want him for President.  He says he is running because the Democratic party isn't pushing the liberal agenda enough.  What?

Regardless, thank God for Ralph Nader and his blocking move on Kerry.  Our country will stand the better for it.


dago
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #29 on: February 23, 2004, 01:08:25 PM »
This isn't as outrageous as you think.  

The house has 435 people in it representing the different districts.  Out in the US there are some pretty radical districts.  So say 5 radicals get elected.  They try to do some wierd stuff.



I wouldn't be worried about this at all.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"