Author Topic: Impeach Bush.... are they serious? (Read 1664 times)

Eagler · « **Reply #45 on:** February 23, 2004, 05:24:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crowMAW
True...but isn't it amazing that so many intelligent conservatives in here support an incompetent president?!

hmm - what would one have to do for you to consider him to be competent?

considering what Bush inherented from the last ahole in the oral office, I think he has done a fantastic job with the country both economically and with its security.
im sure the handsomehunkcrat goron would have had the dow over 15k by now and 9/11 would never of happened huh?

Eagler · « **Reply #46 on:** February 23, 2004, 05:25:35 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crowMAW
True...but isn't it amazing that so many intelligent conservatives in here support an incompetent president?!

hmm - what would one have to do for you to consider him to be competent?

considering what Bush inherented from the last ahole in the oral office, I think he has done a fantastic job with the country both economically and with its security.
im sure the handsomehunkcrat goron would have had the dow over 15k by now and 9/11 would never of happened huh?

Thrawn · « **Reply #47 on:** February 23, 2004, 06:00:07 PM »

Cripes aren't you guys happy to no longer have an adminstration that had 30!! offiicals convicted of breaking the law. Nothing but a bunch of criminals!

Cripes I'm disgusted at the past US administration and I'm not even American.

Pongo · « **Reply #48 on:** February 23, 2004, 06:03:31 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Thrawn
Cripes aren't you guys happy to no longer have an adminstration that had 30!! offiicals convicted of breaking the law. Nothing but a bunch of criminals!

Cripes I'm disgusted at the past US administration and I'm not even American.

I wonder which administration has the most felons in it. The most millionairs.?

mrblack · « **Reply #49 on:** February 23, 2004, 06:05:35 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
I wonder which administration has the most felons in it. The most millionairs.?

LOL what do you care go play in the snow EH!

Yeager · « **Reply #50 on:** February 23, 2004, 06:09:27 PM »

1. Committing a felony by outting a CIA operative.
====
Dont think Bush did this, whoever did should go to jail.

2. Exagerating and fabricating US Intelligence to justify the war with Iraq.
====
Seemed like the right thing to do. Lets get back to this subject 10 years from now and see what developed.

3. Giving no-bid contracts to Haliburton (Chenney's former company).... which is now under scrutiny by the GAO for fraud.
====
Yup. Dont like this one at all. Cheney needs to go. Nice guy and lots of strong convictions that I agree with but even the appearance of impropriety with Haliburton is bad for the country. Thing is, Bush wont sack Cheney unless Cheney dies from a heart attack (real possibility, surprized it hasnt already happened).

4. Violating the US Constitution by putting US citizens in jail indefinately with out due process, denying them the right to see an attonery and prove the allegations against them are false. Btw the US Supreme court is reviewing this matter and has already declared several actions by the Administration as unconstitutional.
====
Im with the Prez on this one. Its hard for me to imagine an innocent american born citizen getting stuffed away down at the Git for no good reason, but if it happens Im sure it will get straightened out.

In the meantime I think the war against AQ is is being handled superbly well by the best people in uniform service in the world, with the leadership of a pretty decent guy as prez, compared to the last POS team that managed to bull dung their way into the O-Office.

Jmo of course

Thrawn · « **Reply #51 on:** February 23, 2004, 06:16:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
I wonder which administration has the most felons in it. The most millionairs.?

It was bait Pongo, I was talking about the Reagan adminstration.

The Clinton adminstration had one (Secretary of Agriculture, something to do with football tickets), to Reagan's 30.

But if you tell big enough lie often enough.

Republican = TEH STRONG MOARAL LEDER!

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #52 on:** February 23, 2004, 06:16:55 PM »

As far as felons,

All I could find so far for GWB is (1) John Poindexter, but he had his conviction overturned in appellate court, and (2) Elliot Abrams who pleaded guilty of withholding information from congress but was pardoned by GHWB.

So I think so far that is zero… still looking

midnight Target · « **Reply #53 on:** February 23, 2004, 06:33:22 PM »

RE: Bush and Reagan .... all I can say is that Bush helps Reagan look smarter.

Bodhi · « **Reply #54 on:** February 23, 2004, 07:18:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Duedel
Reagan had style and his own point of view. Bush is just a puppet like u, Bodhi and all those other neo-con pom pom wavers.
To compare this monkey with Reagan is an affront even againts Mr. Cowboy.

WOOHOO... I AM NOW A PUPPET....

never made it to that status before, especially not by a slighted euro trash wanna-be.

Oh, dip*****, u do not suppose Bush has his own style??? Hell, Reagan was not even in control the last three years in office owing to his advanced state of Alzheimers.... then again, you guys were would never know as you were to busy reaping the benefits of a reunifying country after 40+ years of US, British and French assistance in garnering it for you....

Deudel, sometimes you outdo your own levels of ignorance!

Yeager · « **Reply #55 on:** February 23, 2004, 07:31:48 PM »

all I can say is that Bush helps Reagan look smarter.
====
Your not saying much but thats par for the course.

Heres the deal: Reagan screwed up some, like every President has, but his accomplishments, in my eyes, far outweigh his failures. Besides, he was the first President I voted for so I have a soft spot in my heart for "The Gipper"!!!

Go Dutch!:D

Pongo · « **Reply #56 on:** February 23, 2004, 08:00:12 PM »

In order to impeach him a huge piece of the US population would have to admit they are stupid and the press would have to admit they are assesories.
Like him or hate him. He hasnt been sneaky about it..its been right out there to see since befor he was sworn in.
He is the kind of leader many americans want.

crowMAW · « **Reply #57 on:** February 23, 2004, 10:59:54 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
hmm - what would one have to do for you to consider him to be competent?

For starters, he would have to be able to read the whole intelligence report, which includes reading all the caveats about how unreliable the info is, rather than simply reading the parts that agree with his PNAC cronies' agenda.

He would also need to be able to put together an administration that is competent enough not to "forget" that Tenet pulled the "yellow cake" comment out of an October speech, so that 3 months later the same inaccurate comment is not included in the State of the Union Address.

It would also be nice to have a Repugnantcan candidate who doesn't get bored when his top economic advisor is telling him about the state of all us regular boring Americans who work for a living.

Sox62 · « **Reply #58 on:** February 23, 2004, 11:42:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nakhui
Compare all that to lying about an after hours blow job between consenting adults.

You do understand that this lie was to a grand jury,and is perjury?

lord dolf vader · « **Reply #59 on:** February 24, 2004, 02:24:44 AM »

he he what is funny is you dont understand why there are two seperate one for perjery and one for lie. when you force somone to answer a question under oath on a matter not involved with the case in question. i.e. the infamous blowjob it aint perjery. its a lie. (if the guy honestly believed that he wasent having sexual intercource he wasen't even lieing). aint words and the law a *****.

turn off the republican am radio and read a ****in book.