Author Topic: Impeach Bush.... are they serious?  (Read 1578 times)

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #60 on: February 24, 2004, 05:30:46 AM »
That Iran-Contra affair of Reagan's administration was alot of fun. Selling arms to Iran to pay for a secret war outlawed by a democratic body. Would you take a look at all the moral fibre there! Fine... Upstanding... Righteous!
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #61 on: February 24, 2004, 06:02:23 AM »
Iran-Contra was an obscure sideshow compared to Saddam and the thwarting of the Prevention of Genocide Act. You have to give a small particular group of Reps kudos as they've spun that into a PR blackhole.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #62 on: February 24, 2004, 06:11:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lord dolf vader
when you force somone to answer a question under oath on a matter not involved with the case in question. i.e. the infamous blowjob it aint perjery. its a lie.


Its always so cute when non-legal types try to pretend they know stuff about the law.


Definition:   \Per"ju*ry\, n.; pl. {Perjuries}. [L. perjurium. See
{Perjure}, v.]
1. False swearing.

2. (Law) At common law, a willfully false statement in a fact
   material to the issue, made by a witness under oath in a
   competent judicial proceeding. By statute the penalties of
   perjury are imposed on the making of willfully false
   affirmations.

Note: If a man swear falsely in nonjudicial affidavits, it is
      made perjury by statute in some jurisdictions in the
      United States.

 
 
Legal Dictionary
 
  Definition:   The criminal offense of making a false statement under oath.



LIE: Dictionary Entry and Meaning
Pronunciation:    lee, lI

Definition:   [n]  a statement that deviates from or perverts the truth
[v]  tell an untruth; pretend with intent to deceive; "Don't lie to your parents"; "She lied when she told me she was only 29"

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12770
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #63 on: February 24, 2004, 07:22:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
RE: Bush and Reagan .... all I can say is that Bush helps Reagan look smarter.


While all the dems make those two look as honest as ole cherry tree George.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #64 on: February 24, 2004, 08:25:33 AM »
Today ought to be interesting...
The heads of the CIA, FBI, and the DIA are testifying before Congress about the greatest threat to America...

Tenet will be responding to allegations by Senator Levin that the CIA exagerated and even with held information.... the Senate is also investigating "policy makers" and the possibility that they exagerated and even fabricated intelligence.

And the Pentagon's Office of "Special Plans" may even be brought up - that's the new White House scape goat as to why Bush was "mislead".... remember in a Republican administration the leader is never at fault.

After all, Reagan wasn't to blame for Iran-Contra, even though supporting the Contras (aka Freedom Fighters) was his pet project.

And it's interesting that there was no "scandal" when Republican President George Herbert Walker Bush pardoned Caspar Weinberger with an indictment filed against him, thus avoiding any questions regarding the involvement of that same Republican President in the Iran-Contra Affair. There was no "scandal" when a partisan court appointed the highest elected official in this country.

There was no "scandal" when an intern was found dead of mysterious causes in Florida Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough's office. There was no "scandal" when Republican Mayor Philip Giordano of Waterbury, Connecticut was caught and charged as a sexual predator of young girls.

There was no "scandal" when the Republican President George Walker Bush nominated Theodore Olson (investigated for obstruction of justice and lying to Congress during the Superfund investigation) to the office of Solicitor General. There was no "scandal" when Florida Governor Jeb Bush's daughter, Noelle Bush, was charged with felony fraud in obtaining a controlled substance.

There was no "scandal" when Republican President George Walker Bush's daughters, Jenna and Barbara Bush, then 18, were convicted with using illegally obtained and false identification to obtain alcohol. There was no "scandal" when Mark A. Grethen, a Republican activist, nominated for "Republican of the Year" was convicted and is serving a more than 20 year sentence in prison for six counts of sex crimes involving children.

There was no "scandal" when Wendy Gramm, the wife of prominent Republican Senator Phil Gramm, approved illegal partnerships and waived the code of ethics for those partnership formations while on the Board of Directors of Enron. There is no "scandal" when Kenneth "Kenny Boy" Lay (Enron and Lay contributed $2.16 Million to Republicans in the 2000 election cycle) the largest contributor to the sitting Republican President, George Walker Bush, currently being investigated for leading one of the largest American companies, Enron, into bankruptcy following fraudulently filed earnings reports.

There was no "scandal" when Enron was allowed to price-gouge consumers and the sitting Republican President George Walker Bush refused to allow the Federal Energy Regulatory Committee (FERC) to impose price caps to control excess profiteering. There was no "scandal" when the current sitting Republican President George Walker Bush appointed Elliott Abrams (convicted of lying to Congress about the Iran-Contra affair) to the Human Rights Commission of the United Nations.

There was no "scandal" when John Ashcroft, the current Republican Attorney General, spuriously gave a "reprieve" and discontinued the lawfully entered agreement for damages to The Adams Mark Hotel, owned by Fred S. Kummer Jr, a personal friend and $25,700 senatorial campaign contributor, for charges of serious violations of racial discrimination.

There was no "scandal" when key figures, John Negroponte (complicit in the Honduran Death Squads), Richard Armitage (linked to illegal arms transfers and CIA drug-running operations), Otto Reich (propaganda operative), John Poindexter (convicted of conspiracy {obstruction of inquiries and proceedings, false statements, falsification, destruction and removal of documents}; two counts of obstruction of Congress and two counts of false statements) of the Iran-Contra Affair have re-appeared in official governmental positions by appointment by George Walker Bush, the sitting Republican President, the son of the former Republican President, George Herbert Walker Bush, for whom these men worked.

There is no "scandal" when the current Republican Vice President Richard Cheney refuses to release what should be public records of meetings held in the formulation of public policy (The Energy Policy) after being ordered to do so by three Federal Judges (U. S. District Judge Gladys Kessler, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan and U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman). There is no "scandal" when the personal fortune of George Walker Bush, the sitting Republican President, is being bolstered by governmental war contracts to The Carlyle Group, partially owned by his father, former Republican President, George Herbert Walker Bush.

Don't worry about those "scandals," you know the "liberal" major media corporations (Rupert Murdoch of FOX - $30,033 to RNC... AOL/Time Warner/Walter Isaacson of CNN - $6,150 to RNC... GE/Jack Welch of NBC - $160,350 to RNC... Disney/Michael Eisner/ABC - $208,052 to RNC) are surely going to tell you every "scandal" that they want you to know.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #65 on: February 24, 2004, 08:40:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nakhui
Don't worry about those "scandals," you know the "liberal" major media corporations (Rupert Murdoch of FOX - $30,033 to RNC... AOL/Time Warner/Walter Isaacson of CNN - $6,150 to RNC... GE/Jack Welch of NBC - $160,350 to RNC... Disney/Michael Eisner/ABC - $208,052 to RNC) are surely going to tell you every "scandal" that they want you to know.



LOL - you for real?

they get more than that at most fund raiser dinners. slick gets almost that everytime he opens his lyin trap ....

can you say chump change to an org as large as the RNC?

ya, they can be bought for such "large" sums - LOL, you are funny
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #66 on: February 24, 2004, 08:57:55 AM »
Halliburton faces criminal probe

Now here's a surprise....

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/02/23/halliburton.probe/index.html

The Pentagon's investigation into allegations a Halliburton subsidiary may have overcharged for gasoline delivered to Iraq last year is now a criminal probe, the Pentagon said Monday.

"The Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the criminal investigative arm of the Inspector General's office, is investigating allegations of fraud on the part of Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), including the potential overpricing of fuel delivered to Baghdad by a KBR subcontractor," a Pentagon statement said.

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #67 on: February 24, 2004, 09:02:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
LOL - you for real?

they get more than that at most fund raiser dinners. slick gets almost that everytime he opens his lyin trap ....

can you say chump change to an org as large as the RNC?

ya, they can be bought for such "large" sums - LOL, you are funny


You only see the simple stuff don't you.
Is it all about $$$? Or is there something else going on?
I know it's not a dot you can see... so it's hard to connect.

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #68 on: February 24, 2004, 09:05:47 AM »
Wow Eagler, after everything posted in that thread, that's the only thing you can attack.  Interesting.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #69 on: February 24, 2004, 09:29:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
Wow Eagler, after everything posted in that thread, that's the only thing you can attack.  Interesting.

Not really. If you read it a bit closer that wall of text says nothing but "waaa waaa, I wish there was some scandal I could pin on the republicans"...

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #70 on: February 24, 2004, 09:48:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
Wow Eagler, after everything posted in that thread, that's the only thing you can attack.  Interesting.


the rest of his post wasn't even worth mentioning as it was even more ridiculous than the "media bribe" of relative pennies...
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #71 on: February 24, 2004, 11:29:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hortlund
"waaa waaa, I wish there was some scandal I could pin on the republicans"...


LOL :p

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #72 on: February 24, 2004, 11:29:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
the rest of his post wasn't even worth mentioning as it was even more ridiculous than the "media bribe" of relative pennies...


You're still clueless... :p

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #73 on: February 24, 2004, 11:32:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nakhui
Halliburton faces criminal probe

Now here's a surprise....

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/02/23/halliburton.probe/index.html

The Pentagon's investigation into allegations a Halliburton subsidiary may have overcharged for gasoline delivered to Iraq last year is now a criminal probe, the Pentagon said Monday.

"The Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the criminal investigative arm of the Inspector General's office, is investigating allegations of fraud on the part of Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), including the potential overpricing of fuel delivered to Baghdad by a KBR subcontractor," a Pentagon statement said.


Here's a bigger surprise

Quote
U.S. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., sent 28 letters in behalf of a San Diego defense contractor who pleaded guilty last week to illegally funneling campaign contributions to the Massachusetts senator and four other congressmen.

Nakhui

  • Guest
Impeach Bush.... are they serious?
« Reply #74 on: February 24, 2004, 11:44:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
]Here's a bigger surprise[/URL]


Doest surprise me... Kerry is just another Republican snot running as a Democrat.

Even worse... he doesn't stay committed to any issue...

He's for the war - he's against the war...
He's for tax cuts-- he's against tax cuts...
He's for gays - he's against gays...
He's for the patriot act - he's against the patriot act...

Kerry's a political potato... he'll agree with whoever is paying him until the next "John Lobbyist" comes along and pays him more.