« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 21   Go Down

Author Topic: Dubya to Jump Shark  (Read 5763 times)

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #15 on: February 24, 2004, 10:33:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKcurly
Never happen Funky for the reason Yeager pointed out:  It opens the constitution for all manner of changes and no one is crazy enough to risk that.  Heh, not even Bush. ;)

curly

Careful Curly, Arnold wants to be The Prezinater and that would require changing the Constitution. 2 birds with 1 sledgehammer.
Logged
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Dinger

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1705
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #16 on: February 24, 2004, 10:35:44 AM »
yeager, there's a difference between passing an amendment and a constitutional convention.

Yeah, and give me a break. This will be the best amendment since XVIII
Logged

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #17 on: February 24, 2004, 10:36:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
Gay marriage is the most important issue in the world today.


For you.

How's that Streisand CD holding up?
Logged

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2004, 10:38:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
Do I understand correctly ?
A modification of the constitution for the purpose banning gay mariage ?

Wow ...

Does French law allow same-sex marriage?
Logged

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #19 on: February 24, 2004, 11:09:26 AM »
It would not ban gay marriage.  It would simply define legal marriage as a union between a single MAN and a single WOMAN.

The gay folk would call it a ban.  I would call it a clarification.  The states would still be allowed, and as I understand it, encouraged to create laws protecting the rights of gay couples.

You may be right dinger.  When is a constitutional convention required?
Logged
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #20 on: February 24, 2004, 11:33:15 AM »
Lets see....

Crappy stance on immigration... check
Blew the budget to kingdom come..... check
Wants to restrict the rights of law abiding citizens... check
Lied about WMD..... check
Thinks science is a dirty word (stem cell research)... check

Wondering why he'd get anyone's vote.
Logged

Offline AKcurly

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1509
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #21 on: February 24, 2004, 11:36:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager

You may be right dinger.  When is a constitutional convention required?


Dinger is incorrect.

http://www.usconstitution.net/constam.html

curly
Logged

Nakhui

  • Guest
Re: Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #22 on: February 24, 2004, 11:37:59 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1

Unbelievable.  I literally can not believe they are this stupid, and that they think voters are this stupid.  Please prove me right America.


Bush can get the votes in Congress... though he'll have a tough time getting it ratified by 2/3 of the states.

It's amaizing how the Right Wing get all up set about what other people do in the privacy of their own homes... and what status other people have between themselves and society.

Conservatives are a bunch of noisy busy bodies!

At the same time they love their music, TV shows, fashion, and all kinds of other things that gay people create and contribute to in American society.

It's nice to have second class citizenry.. isn't it.

Heck perhaps Bush can even get women's vote and civil rights admendments revoked....

Fascism is still alive.
Logged

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
Re: Re: Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2004, 11:41:23 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nakhui
Bush can get the votes in Congress... though he'll have a tough time getting it ratified by 2/3 of the states.

It's amaizing how the Right Wing get all up set about what other people do in the privacy of their own homes... and what status other people have between themselves and society.

Conservatives are a bunch of noisy busy bodies!

At the same time they love their music, TV shows, fashion, and all kinds of other things that gay people create and contribute to in American society.

It's nice to have second class citizenry.. isn't it.

Heck perhaps Bush can even get women's vote and civil rights admendments revoked....

Fascism is still alive.


Yep.

Next we'll work on getting all BBS second accounts disbanded.  Stay tuned.
Logged

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2004, 11:44:52 AM »
Funny how the lefties think that a judge defying state law by marrying homosexuals is an example of healthy democracy.

Homosexuals have the exact same marriage rights as everyone else.  They have the right to marry a member of the opposite sex.

ra
Logged

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2004, 11:50:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by ra
Does French law allow same-sex marriage?


Almost it's called a PACS.
Logged

Offline slimm50

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2684
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #26 on: February 24, 2004, 12:04:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ra
Funny how the lefties think that a judge defying state law by marrying homosexuals is an example of healthy democracy.

Homosexuals have the exact same marriage rights as everyone else.  They have the right to marry a member of the opposite sex.

ra

Ditto
Logged

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #27 on: February 24, 2004, 12:06:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ra
Funny how the lefties think that a judge defying state law by marrying homosexuals is an example of healthy democracy.


ra


you do understand how this country was founded, and the principles of fighting for freedom on which it was based right ra?
Or are you just another ditto head that is crying for a nanny state to make sure all the people stop sinning against the bibble? Well if so you better start getting stores to ban pork and shellfish. Maybe a constitutional admendment is in order.
Logged

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #28 on: February 24, 2004, 12:09:43 PM »
How does opposition to silly frivolous Constitutional amendments on issues the government has no business dealing with make one a lefty?
Logged

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12797
Dubya to Jump Shark
« Reply #29 on: February 24, 2004, 12:12:40 PM »
From Curly's link:

It is interesting to note that at no point does the President have a role in the formal amendment process (though he would be free to make his opinion known). He cannot veto an amendment proposal, nor a ratification.

So let's all pile on Bush for expressing his opinion. :rolleyes:  I oughta sic the ACLU on you guys for trying deny free speech here. They're chompin' at the bit waitin' for me to say go.
Logged
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 21   Go Up
« previous next »