Author Topic: Dubya to Jump Shark (Read 5764 times)

Frogm4n · « **Reply #30 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:12:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FUNKED1
How does opposition to silly frivolous Constitutional amendments on issues the government has no business dealing with make one a lefty?

Because you argue with our lord and emporer George W. Bush SIEG HIEL!

ra · « **Reply #31 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:15:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FUNKED1
How does opposition to silly frivolous Constitutional amendments on issues the government has no business dealing with make one a lefty?

The government has no business defining marriage? That's an interesting take. Let's render all laws regarding marriage null and void.

Dinger · « **Reply #32 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:16:15 PM »

Curly, I stand by what I said, and that link backs me up.

passing amendment != constitutional convention. A CC can make an amendment, but it's not the only way; and it's a way that's never been used.

Libertarians are lefties in disguise.

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #33 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:19:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ra
The government has no business defining marriage? That's an interesting take. Let's render all laws regarding marriage null and void.

Let's. It's a personal/spiritual thing between two people, and the government has no business regulating it.

Yeager · « **Reply #34 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:23:32 PM »

"In God We Trust"

It says so right here on this Nickle..........

Thud · « **Reply #35 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:24:29 PM »

History repeating itself, in a few decades even the most retarded conservative will accept that gays have as equal rights as any other citizen.
Only a few lost rednecks will cherish the time they could still discriminate at will, just as happened with another oppressed group a last two centuries, remember that one?
Discrimination is immoral, not two people dedicated to spending their life together in matrimony.

Frogm4n · « **Reply #36 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:25:16 PM »

Yes and we can all thank McCarthyism for that yeager.
BTW nice orginal name. You and maverick should have a tea party.

ra · « **Reply #37 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:26:29 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FUNKED1
Let's. It's a personal/spiritual thing between two people, and the government has no business regulating it.

A marriage is a legal arrangement. You don't know what you're talking about. Typical for a lefty to use any political issue as a chance to trumpet how open minded he is, rather than talk about the substance. Continue.

ra

Horn · « **Reply #38 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:28:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FUNKED1
Let's. It's a personal/spiritual thing between two people, and the government has no business regulating it.

Agreed. It will also be interesting to see the fireworks in the Cheney household if this goes further.

More specifically, the gov't should just allow the civil part of the ceremony and call it a day.

h

Frogm4n · « **Reply #39 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:30:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Yeager
"In God We Trust"

It says so right here on this Nickle..........

oh and its not the christian god that we trust, its any god. Thats how its slips by the seperation of church and state clause.

So yes in God we turst, and my God is a happy fruity God that supports gay marriage and is angered by people that push their values on others. It also ****s out Hot wings and throws up a nice lager.

Thud · « **Reply #40 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:30:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ra
Typical for a lefty to use any political issue as a chance to trumpet how open minded he is, rather than talk about the substance. Continue.

ra

Typical for a narrowminded conservative to desire regulating and limiting the freedom of those with different ideas and values while having a seizure at the thought any federal influence on themselves. Ladies & Gentlemen, today's word is 'Hypocrit'...

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #41 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:32:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ra
A marriage is a legal arrangement.

I'm saying it shouldn't be a legal arrangement. Why does the government need to be involved? Can you elaborate on that instead of making unfounded declarations about my knowledge and political orientation? I realize that ad hominem is an appealing form of argument to the weak-minded, but I think you are smarter than that.

Torque · « **Reply #42 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:36:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Yeager
"In God We Trust"

It says so right here on this Nickle..........

Shouldn't that read "In Gun we trust"

AKcurly · « **Reply #43 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:36:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dinger
Curly, I stand by what I said, and that link backs me up.

passing amendment != constitutional convention. A CC can make an amendment, but it's not the only way; and it's a way that's never been used.

Libertarians are lefties in disguise.

Dinger, in practice, there's one way to amend the constitution and that's through a constitutional convention.

For example, 2 sticks of dynamite will flush a toilet, but it's normally not done that way.

curly

Frogm4n · « **Reply #44 on:** February 24, 2004, 12:37:05 PM »

This entire issue makes me laugh. The people against it become hipocrites, and most of them cannot even give a logical arguement other then "the bible says so".