I don't get it.
Even if what you claim is true, how's getting a P-51D gonna solve any of the "outruns, outturns
, outclimbs, outdives" issue? Especially when a lot of knowledgeable people flying P-51s tend to say the P-51B is the more deadlier pure fighter of the two?
Not to mention the fact that "upstairs performance" you say, is actually better with the P-51B - as the P-51B both climbs better way better than the D over 10k above, and becomes faster than the D at 15k above.
Also there's the little fact that the advantages of the P-51s at alt, in speed category, shows only over 25,000 ft - the 109 still climbs better than the both of those planes upto 30k.
Another strange thing is, you say; "I only got one kill... not becuase I am a bad pilot, but becuase every time I met an axis player they were flying the G10, and they were at 20-25K over the channle catching me at 12K.".
Then, you're saying you wouldn't be at 12k if you had a P-51D? When the P-51B is actually better than the D at alt?
...
A lot of people would willingly dispute the fact the G-10 out turns the P-51B.
In the dive category the G-10 is absolutely no match against any P-51. While the top speeds are comparable, dive acceleration is much slower in the G-10 so usually, the P-51 out runs the G-10, at least upto the point where it matters. Besides, anything over 420mph and the G-10 turns into a pig.
Frankly kegger, none of what you say makes sense.
ps) Besides, sorry to turn this into an Axis-Allied comparison, but I think people took it very well when the N1Ks and Ki61s they were flying were 60~70mph slower than the P-38L at alt.
You're asking for a P-51D because the Bf109G-10 marginally out turns the P-51B, and is 10mph faster than the P-51B at 25k??
ps2) Hmm, on second thought, I wouldn't mind. If people can't handle a G-10 with a P-51B, then it's not much different whether or not the D is added in.
ps3) This, is one of the weirdest requests I've seen in the CT.
