I patiently wait until D-700 and hammer away. Then they whine on channel one how the buff guns are uber.
Lethality is the same with all others, velocity at impact appears to determine the amount of damage. So if you are in a p51 d700 dead 6 firing at a buff and he’s firing back 1 hit from him on you will cause more damage then you on him. You are flying into his rounds. You may have experienced this effect in a ho as well.
So lethality isn't an issue with buffs. (unless it is across the board with all planes with 50s)
But I quote you above because
d700....Testing done by the USAAF found that the bullet pattern from a B-17
during ground testing had the following results for 12 rounds to 600yds:ball turret > dia. 15' - 8.3mils
upper turret > dia. 21' - 11.7mils
chin turret > dia. 23' - 12.6 mils
waist(closed) dia. 26' - 14.3mils
side nose > dia. 34' - 18.7mils
tail turret > dia 45' - 25mils
For the B-24 it was:
ball turret > dia. 15' - 8.3mils
upper turret > dia. 20' - 11.2mils
nose turret > dia. 23' - 12.9mils (Emerson)
nose turret > dia. 35' - 19.3mils (Motor Prod.)
waist(closed) dia. 23' - 12.9mils
waist(open) dia. 63' - 35.6mils
tail turret > dia 35' - 19.3mils
At 600yrd the tail gunner pattern is 45 feet firing 12 rounds. With no vibration, eng stream effects etc the gunner positions are as stable as a field gun and allow the gunner to easily aim at long range and score hits. Combine this with what I stated above its no wonder some folk’s feel that buff guns are over done. Certainly the lack of gun shake etc is a game play decision but it’s also clear that buff gunners in ah are far more accurate then one reads about in rl.
There is some truth in what he says. You may like it as is but that has no bearing on whether hes right or wrong.