Author Topic: WMD 'found'?  (Read 497 times)

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
WMD 'found'?
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2004, 11:28:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lizking
The U.S. invaded Iraq under the pretext that Iraq possessed a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction

That quote is maddening.  Can they not, or do they just not want to, understand why we went to Iraq?

We went not because Saddam HAD WMDs, we went because
he would not comply and confirm that he did NOT have them.  Is that too fine a line to draw?  Hell, it was pounded upon for 12 years in the World press!

Saddam lost his Country because his ego was too big for him to admit that he did not have the WMD.  How stupid is that?


So your saying it was not part of the war on terror?

Offline Lizking

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2502
WMD 'found'?
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2004, 11:44:09 PM »
Of course it was.

Offline Frogm4n

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2371
WMD 'found'?
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2004, 11:52:24 PM »
How so? you just said it was because he didnt let inspectors in. We had and still have no evidence that saddam gave WMD's to terrorists or had actively helped al qaeda.

Yet we are 'allies' with 2 countrys that have. Pakistand and the Saudis.