Author Topic: side balancing (again)  (Read 2252 times)

Offline nopoop

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3213
side balancing (again)
« Reply #15 on: April 19, 2004, 07:46:05 PM »
Isn't Sunday night rook night ??
nopoop

It's ALL about the fight.in a brew...

Offline 68DevilM

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
side balancing (again)
« Reply #16 on: April 19, 2004, 09:44:28 PM »
this is very unusual look at the number of knights on

funny thing is an hour earlier we were out numbered big time:rofl



Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
side balancing (again)
« Reply #17 on: April 19, 2004, 10:18:16 PM »
OMFG CAN HTC SORT OUT KNIGHTS NUMBER ADVANTAGE PLEASE!!! THEY ALWAYS HAVE MORE NUMBERS! ARRG OMG WTF OMG FFS!









:rofl :lol :p
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Wadke

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
side balancing (again)
« Reply #18 on: April 19, 2004, 10:40:06 PM »
More Rooks = More Targets :)

Offline ALF

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1208
      • http://www.mikethinks.com
side balancing (again)
« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2004, 11:15:53 PM »
This isnt going away...for nearly 8 months the Rooks were in the proverbial BUCKET....and now that tide has turned.  

Also, for christ sake...has noone figured out that Rooks have a huge number of squad opps on Sunday nights?  I mean, I see these posts each and every monday...ya'll do understand right?

Currently Knits have a significant nurmerical advantage....

Offline ET

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 325
side balancing (again)
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2004, 06:16:09 AM »
I agree with lasersailor. The perks should be based on bases
owned.
Based on manning, it does not account for 2 smaller countrys gangbanging one.

Offline 68DevilM

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
side balancing (again)
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2004, 06:33:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Overlag
OMFG CAN HTC SORT OUT KNIGHTS NUMBER ADVANTAGE PLEASE!!! THEY ALWAYS HAVE MORE NUMBERS! ARRG OMG WTF OMG FFS!


no we dont we are usually outnumbered by like 100 players









:rofl :lol :p
:confused:

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
side balancing (again)
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2004, 06:49:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 68DevilM
:confused:


sar·casm  (särkzm)
n.
A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.
A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.
The use of sarcasm. See Synonyms at wit1.


it was a joke......hence the smiles
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline 68DevilM

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
side balancing (again)
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2004, 06:55:47 AM »
rgr:D

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
side balancing (again)
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2004, 07:19:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 68DevilM
rgr:D


being a former knight i know how they get treated :(
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
side balancing (again)
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2004, 08:04:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
been a knit for quite a while... don't mind the numbers but when the radar is down and the fuel is porked I just go to the CT or log..  


Which is why there should be no central radar station. Each base's radar should work independently of the other bases.  Instead, the "country radar" should be a Spitfire factory ala Air Warrior.

Offline 68DevilM

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
side balancing (again)
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2004, 10:04:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Overlag
being a former knight i know how they get treated :(


been a knight the whole time and am used to getting pummled by the rooks and then the bish feels good to finally have the advantage, although i would perfer people not to side hop just becuase the numbers are greater or less, should be downright illegal, like tratior they should be shot:mad:

Offline jaxxo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
side balancing (again)
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2004, 10:15:33 AM »
gimme a break knits. bish have it just as bad as you with number situation, and we deal with both knits and the rooks continually gangin, so stop your whinin. Rooks usually reset due to numbers yes, you knits are miffed cause second place stinks? Bish get there bellybutton handed to them regularly.

Offline BigGun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
side balancing (again)
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2004, 11:02:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by jaxxo
gimme a break knits. bish have it just as bad as you with number situation, and we deal with both knits and the rooks continually gangin, so stop your whinin. Rooks usually reset due to numbers yes, you knits are miffed cause second place stinks? Bish get there bellybutton handed to them regularly.


Bish+Knight United!!!!

Offline Sixpence

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5265
      • http://www.onpoi.net/ah/index.php
side balancing (again)
« Reply #29 on: April 20, 2004, 11:24:54 AM »
It is my belief that most have two accounts to jump to a side that is winning. If HTC forced side balancing, they would lose out on all that money. That would be a bad business decision.
"My grandaddy always told me, "There are three things that'll put a good man down: Losin' a good woman, eatin' bad possum, or eatin' good possum."" - Holden McGroin

(and I still say he wasn't trying to spell possum!)