Author Topic: Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!  (Read 682 times)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« on: May 20, 2004, 07:53:37 AM »
It is not like most of us here knew the UN was a corrupt organization in regards to Iraq.

 

Audit report here:

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/un_oilforfood_audit.pdf

 

 

NEW YORK — An internal United Nations audit from 2003 found significant problems with the international organization's Iraqi oil-for-food program, revealing that millions of dollars went unaccounted for.

 

*******>  

 
******** language=JavaScript>OAS_AD('Middle');*********>
********>
 

The 23-page audit by the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (search) into the program — now the subject of an independent probe looking into allegations of abuse — also revealed problems with the oil-for-food program's administration, specifically with a company that employed Secretary General Kofi Annan's son as it prepared to bid for an oil-for-food contract.

 

Click to read the U.N. internal audit of the oil-for-food program.

 

The audit devotes almost 20 pages to the U.N.’s dealings with Cotecna (search), a Swiss-based company that was awarded a $4.8 million dollar contract for the oil-for-food program just months after Annan’s son, Kojo, ended a consulting assignment with the firm.

 

It is not clear if Annan himself ever read the audit. He has insisted in the past that he was unaware of any problems with the oil-for-food program while it was in operation. He has also denied any conflict of interest with his son’s involvement with Cotecna.

 

The April 8, 2003 report was addressed to Benon Sevan (search), former head of the oil-for-food program. Sevan has refused to talk to Fox News about the program or his role in the matter, except to say that he has done nothing wrong.

 

The document was obtained by Mineweb.com, an international mining publication based in South Africa that focuses on mining finance and corporate news.

 

The overall conclusion of the report is "that management of the Contract has not been adequate and certain provisions of the Contract have not been adhered to." The incorporation of additional costs was deemed "uneconomical" and the Contract was "amended prior to its commencement, which was inappropriate."

 

The Office of Iraq Programs needs to "strengthen its management of contracts and the Procurement Division should ensure that the basis of payment is appropriate in order to avoid additional costs to the Organization," the audit found.

 

Several references in the audit are damning to Cotecna and seem to openly question the relationship between the company and its U.N. client. Among the specific charges listed in the report:

 

— U.N. officials approved $356,000 in “additional costs” to the contract just four days after the proposal was signed.

 

******** language=JavaScript type=text/javascript>                                                *********>******** language=JavaScript src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type=text/javascript>*********>**********>                                                    

 

— Within a year of the contract’s signing, it was amended to add other charges far above those originally approved. This included a hike in the "per man day fee" to $600 from an initial $499. This higher fee "was exactly equal to the offer of the second lowest bidder."

 

— Cotecna and U.N. officials understaffed inspection stations at entry points into Iraq, which “affects the performance of services."

 

— In northern Iraq, where Kurdish officials have said they were cheated out of billions of dollars in oil-for-food aid, there were no inspectors on the job. The result was "huge differences between the figures for goods reported to have arrived by the U.N. agencies and the contractor."

 

The audit found the oil-for-food administration had "been aware" of problems for years but had failed to adequately address them. And it determined no one from the United Nations monitored Cotecna agents operating in Iraq.

 

“In absence of a contract manager, there can be no assurance that the services provided were in consonance with the spirit and letter of the Contract,” the audit stated.

 

But after the report's April 2003 submission — and just three months before handing over control of the oil-for-food program to the Coalition Provisional Authority (search) in Iraq — the United Nations signed a new $9.8 million contract for Cotenca.

 

Cotenca officials declined to answer individual questions about the the company's participation in the program or the role of Kojo Annan. In the past, they've issued statements denying any wrongdoing and maintaining they properly followed all U.N. regulations

 

U.N. officials have said the internal audits and other relevant documents have been handed over to Paul Volcker, who was named by Annan last month to investigate the growing scandal. Volcker has declined requests for interviews, but is expected to make an appearance at a U.N. press briefing on Thursday.

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2004, 07:55:53 AM »
Fox News is teh devel's news

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2004, 08:00:39 AM »
No!  not the cute little blue helmeted folk who want to rule the world for our own good?

lazs

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2004, 08:02:05 AM »
I agree the UN is corrupt and corrupt everyon just look : HalibUrtoN

YetAnotherProof of UN corruption




btw I didn't read your article Rip. it ain't new :)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2004, 08:08:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
I agree the UN is corrupt and corrupt everyon just look : HalibUrtoN

YetAnotherProof of UN corruption




btw I didn't read your article Rip. it ain't new :)


Whats new is the key word "independent":
The 23-page audit by the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (search) into the program — now the subject of an independent probe looking into allegations of abuse"

And the fact that the document was not public before.(apparently, according to this article)

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2004, 08:25:15 AM »
the UN is a commie plot to rob the faithful of our precious bodily fluids and feed them to hungry spiders.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2004, 08:25:37 AM »
what is wrong with halliburton?  didn't they win a fair bid?

lazs

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2004, 08:37:51 AM »





excuse me, carry on....

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13369
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2004, 09:13:17 AM »
When will we see those that have blamed the US for starving the Iraqis for over 10 years redirect their indignation to the ones truly responsible for depriving the Iraqis? When hell freezes over? I suspect they don't even care. Which proves what most of us have known all along, they were only looking for an excuse to ridicule the US.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2004, 09:19:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
....they were only looking for an excuse to ridicule the US.


tinfoil hat time? :D

Offline lada

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1810
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2004, 09:21:25 AM »
at least corruption in UN came to public....

How it happen that Enron boys got contract in Iraq for billions $$ never came to public.

You know... those contracts w/o tender.... gift from President..


naaaa we will not speak about 50 mil.$$ Bush got (on election race) from some company whitch got bill.$$ task in Iraq....

its simply ... over here its illegal and its called corruption... So we have sutch problems...

In US it seems to be legal, just part of bussines, so you have no problems with corruption....

why are you still windering about it ?
« Last Edit: May 20, 2004, 09:26:54 AM by lada »

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13369
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2004, 09:43:28 AM »
No idea what you are talking about lada. Nilsen, no need for your tinfoil hat just yet,  unless you know what lada is talking about. ;)
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2004, 09:49:34 AM »
VV Rip, missed the indepedent part.

Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
When will we see those that have blamed the US for starving the Iraqis for over 10 years redirect their indignation to the ones truly responsible for depriving the Iraqis? When hell freezes over? I suspect they don't even care. Which proves what most of us have known all along, they were only looking for an excuse to ridicule the US.


Seems to me there is a logical flaw in you reasoning.
The UN guys are perhaps guilty of corruption and should be judged + punished.

But do they maintain the embargo during years ?
No, they abused it.
The US are responsible of the embargo.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13369
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2004, 09:58:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
VV Rip, missed the indepedent part.

 

Seems to me there is a logical flaw in you reasoning.
The UN guys are perhaps guilty of corruption and should be judged + punished.

But do they maintain the embargo during years ?
No, they abused it.
The US are responsible of the embargo.


The embargo is not what deprived the Iraqi people. Provisions were made to ensure the Iraqi people's basic needs were met. Siphoning off of these provisions by both Saddam and the UN deprived the Iraqis, not the US.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Corruption in the UN?? Say it ain't so!
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2004, 10:01:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lada
at least corruption in UN came to public....

How it happen that Enron boys got contract in Iraq for billions $$ never came to public.

You know... those contracts w/o tender.... gift from President..


naaaa we will not speak about 50 mil.$$ Bush got (on election race) from some company whitch got bill.$$ task in Iraq....

its simply ... over here its illegal and its called corruption... So we have sutch problems...

In US it seems to be legal, just part of bussines, so you have no problems with corruption....

why are you still windering about it ?


Boy it didnt take long to spin the iraq oil for food corruption into Bush/Enron did it.

OOPS I forgot the UN can do no wrong...