Horsepuckey.
If what you say about Disney is true, that would still be a business decision.
If Disney was afraid that releasing it would pork their efforts to feed at the Florida public trough...... that's a business decision.
It's a simple cost/benefit analysis, one made by Disney, not a government.
Now, would it be legal for Jeb Bush to squash a Disney play for tax credits (and don't get me started on that pork barrel politics stuff!) over the release of a film?
Probably not, but I'm not sure the grounds would be the First. But it would be up to Disney to show that as the cause. I'm sure there's a zillion reasons to turn down a huge multi-national looking to suck at the public teat yet again. Additionally, there's a lot of ways to do it "neutrally". Put it up for a vote in the Legislature for instance.
For those who haven't bothered:
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And for an explanation of what they meant when they wrote it, try:
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION--SPEECH AND PRESS Nice try at stirring up the pot when it's empty Nash. Is this part of your contest?
Ta.