Author Topic: Farenheit 911 Palme d'or of Canne 2004 (Read 2408 times)

Nash · « **Reply #75 on:** May 23, 2004, 02:49:22 AM »

Lol Grun you tool.

Give me enough money and you will start wearin' bell bottoms and not even know why!

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #76 on:** May 23, 2004, 02:51:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by FUNKED1
I am saying that a movie studio choosing not to distribute someone's film does not violate that person's rights.

It is only evil censorship if that person is an america hating left wing nutbag beloved by sphisticate euros and canadians... Otherwise you are correct.

_Schadenfreude_ · « **Reply #77 on:** May 23, 2004, 02:53:12 AM »

http://www.michaelmoore.com/

For some a pretty funny site, for others incandescent rage!

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #78 on:** May 23, 2004, 02:53:35 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Lol Grun you tool.

Give me enough money and you will start wearin' bell bottoms and not even know why!

Once again, there you are, thinkig you are somehow clever...

FUNKED1 · « **Reply #79 on:** May 23, 2004, 02:54:03 AM »

I don't think he is a left wing nutbag. It's probably all just a put-on so he can sell movie tickets to the only people stupid enough to pay to watch his crappy movies. Women, Euros, and Euro-wannabees.

Nash · « **Reply #80 on:** May 23, 2004, 02:54:05 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I cant belive you are so ignorant as not understand such a simple sentence.

Simple sentence?

Look at your simple sentence. Right there.

That's okay though... I can't spell either. It's when ya try and string two or more of them together that gets ya into real trouble.

Funked, it doesn't violate your rights. Yeah. It doesn't even violate the rights of those whose work is muffled. Technically. Constitutionally.

It prolly should violate your sense of well being, however.

(Don't answer... I know it doesn't.)

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #81 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:00:08 AM »

Let me ask you this.

Do you think Disney had the right to decide whether or not to market this film?

Nash · « **Reply #82 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:03:53 AM »

Whattya think I'm stupid?

tool..

Of course they have the right. I think we've been over that.... umpteen times.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #83 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:06:11 AM »

Do you think they made the right decison in not marketing it?

Nash · « **Reply #84 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:07:47 AM »

Well, yes absolutely I think they made the right decision in not marketing it.

I mean, why spend all that money marketing it IF YER NOT THE ONES DISTRIBUTING IT?

tool....

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #85 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:11:32 AM »

I belive Disney owns Miramax. To the best information I have it was Miramax who refused to distribute the film. I think you made mention of Eisner's troubles as part of your argument so I'm gonna refer to the responsible company as Disney...

Sorry for the big words.

Back to Nash level talk:

Do you think Disney made the correct decision in not marketing/distributing this film?

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #86 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:14:00 AM »

Look: the bottom line is that the people attending Cannes are not real people. Just look at the last 10 winners:

2004--Fahrenheit 9/11
2003--Elephant
2002--The Pianist
2001--The Son's Room
2000--Dancer in the Dark
1999--Rosetta
1998--Eternity and a Day
1997--The Taste of Cherry
1996--Secrets and Lies
1995--Underground

I mean come on... not one Bruce Willis or Arnold Schwartzenegger extravaganza?

Nash · « **Reply #87 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:14:30 AM »

Trust me Grun when I say that Disney made the best possible decision in not having anything to do with this film.

Again, that's been discussed already.

You are catching up though... which is a good sign,

Nash · « **Reply #88 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:15:59 AM »

THANK YOU HOLDEN for the.... well, just the suspicion of sanity in this thread.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #89 on:** May 23, 2004, 03:18:47 AM »

I knew you were the suspicious sort.