Originally posted by TweetyBird
>>The 200 switch is one of the most brilliant things HTC has ever done. My kudos.
<<
I agree, but its not original. Throughout history, "unpleasant voice " have been removed (e.g., poisoning philosphers, puratanism, communism, and our current "political correctness.")
But everytime, its lead to change. I can't wait to see how this changes a virtual society.
Book burners have a very poor k/d ratio
I guess because they burn more than they read.
"I DON'T LIKE THAT!!! Remove it!!"
(in a shrill, hysterical, paternalistic voice) "WE MUST ****SAVE**** the ****CHILDREN****!!!!"
Yea right - and power has nothing to do with it eh?
Was just too hard to tune out the smack talk eh? Was just to hard not to read it eh? Yea right - sell it to someone in with a double digit IQ. Anyone in triple digits knows its a power play.
Trivia question - what was the reason given for executing Socrates? (if you didn't burn the damn book you'll know).
I don't usually contribute to these discussions, but I find this utterly absurd.
The "unpleasant voice" has not been removed, it is still there. You can still listen to it if you want to. The difference is now that you have to make an active decision to listen to it (as opposed to an active decision to not listen to it). To me, the difference is responsibility. You make yourself more responsible for what you hear when you choose to listen to that channel, then you did when you just didn't bother (or didn't know how) to squelch it.
I also find the comparison to book burning absurd. If you really want to run with a book analogy, the best I can come up with is this:
It is the difference between having the book in your face when you wake up, and having to push it away if you don't want to read, compared to going over and picking up the book when you want to read it.