Originally posted by Nilsen
Yes, in a way they are. Both are there to acheive a political goal. One is more crude than the other tho.
WOW...
Moral relativism... There we have a perfect example...
So if its just about achieving political obejcives can we ever make a moral distinction between any acts?
For example nazis germnay political objective was to dominate the world and destroy jewish and slavic people on earth. They killed and invaded to achve those gouals.
The western allies objectives were to libererate people from the nazis. They killed and invaded to achive those goals.
According to your thinking, they are comporable.