Author Topic: Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?  (Read 3452 times)

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #30 on: June 26, 2004, 08:34:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
You just said its comporable here Nilsen....

By saying that using 911 is coporable to using iraq war for some example, you are equating them..


The twin towers was a symbol of american  business and that is why it was targeted, not because it held alot of civilians. When american/coaliton attack planes bomb possible saddam sites its an attack on the saddam regime even if alot of civilans are killed. The fact that the US forces killed alot less civilians are due to the advanced weapons you have. The pentagon was also a target, and do you think it was targeted to kill as many civilians as possible? No, it was also a political target.

-edit- why do you think they put peole from so many differetn counties up as "hostages" in these beheading vids. They are not made to discust as many counties as possible, they are targeted directly towards the specific counties to acheive thir goals.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2004, 08:37:31 PM by Nilsen »

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #31 on: June 26, 2004, 08:35:48 PM »
So again you are saying that 911 and iraq war are comporable - just that the weapons are different...

WOW...

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #32 on: June 26, 2004, 08:38:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
So again you are saying that 911 and iraq war are comporable - just that the weapons are different...

WOW...


Yes, in a way they are. Both are there to acheive a political goal. One is more crude than the other tho.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #33 on: June 26, 2004, 08:38:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
Yes, in a way they are. Both are there to acheive a political goal. One is more crude than the other tho.


WOW...

Moral relativism... There we have a perfect example...

So if its just about achieving political obejcives can we ever make a moral distinction between any acts?

For example nazis germnay political objective was to dominate the world and destroy jewish and slavic people on earth. They killed and invaded to achve those gouals.

The western allies objectives were to libererate people from the nazis. They killed and invaded to achive those goals.

According to your thinking, they are comporable.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2004, 08:41:56 PM by GRUNHERZ »

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #34 on: June 26, 2004, 08:40:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
WOW...


Why? did you think they just attacked the twin towers to be "evil"?

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #35 on: June 26, 2004, 08:41:13 PM »
Nilsen ask yer Grandparents about the Nazi occupation of Norway... Get F**Kin real man or just STFU.

:D

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #36 on: June 26, 2004, 08:46:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AWMac
Nilsen ask yer Grandparents about the Nazi occupation of Norway... Get F**Kin real man or just STFU.

:D


I have several times why? Are you claiming that the US liberated norway directly?

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #37 on: June 26, 2004, 08:53:19 PM »
Move your lips like this.."Coalition"  .... Lets just say it wasn't the Norwegian Army that saved your Country...cuddlinghunks:rolleyes:

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #38 on: June 26, 2004, 09:00:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AWMac
Move your lips like this.."Coalition"  .... Lets just say it wasn't the Norwegian Army that saved your Country...cuddlinghunks:rolleyes:


what is your point besides revealing your own lack of knowledge?

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #39 on: June 26, 2004, 09:02:59 PM »
LOL   are you for real ?

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #40 on: June 26, 2004, 09:04:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AWMac
LOL   are you for real ?


Yes i am, but you have yet to make a valid point that everyone can see so please try to be more precise.

Offline AWMac

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9251
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #41 on: June 26, 2004, 09:06:50 PM »
LOL Guess the old saying is true..."You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."

Keep jumping Nilsen....

:rofl

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #42 on: June 26, 2004, 09:09:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AWMac
LOL Guess the old saying is true..."You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."

Keep jumping Nilsen....

:rofl


You still cant come up with anything? Better than this i mean?

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #43 on: June 26, 2004, 09:34:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
Last year I said we should take them out

of course they inspire the terrorists and keep the hatred stirring


     I disagree.  I think we should infiltrate them instead, especially
their shipping dept.  SOMEONE is giving these tapes to AJ..let's
find out who:lol
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Al-Jazeera: Terrorist Mouthpiece or News?
« Reply #44 on: June 26, 2004, 09:38:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
The twin towers was a symbol of american  business and that is why it was targeted, not because it held alot of civilians. When american/coaliton attack planes bomb possible saddam sites its an attack on the saddam regime even if alot of civilans are killed. The fact that the US forces killed alot less civilians are due to the advanced weapons you have. The pentagon was also a target, and do you think it was targeted to kill as many civilians as possible? No, it was also a political target.

-edit- why do you think they put peole from so many differetn counties up as "hostages" in these beheading vids. They are not made to discust as many counties as possible, they are targeted directly towards the specific counties to acheive thir goals.


     Yeah, I guess hitting them between 0800 and 0900 on a
weekday was just a happy coincidence?   I mean who would
expect alot of civvies to be in a building full of civilian businesses
at that time of day?:rolleyes:
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars