Originally posted by myelo
Actually, if you carefully read the link, they explain that they are the same "type" not the same "breed".
But this type of confusion is exactly my point. Breed, like race, is not always a distinct feature of a species. That's why "breed"-specific legislation is ridiculous.
I would cut and paste, but the link is copyright protected.. the basteges!
Basically it says this:
"a physical standard was drawn up for the Pit Bull. The name Pit Bull was a problem for these dog show folks - they felt it would scare people off. They tried several names including Yankee Terrier (a silly name for a bulldog from the UK!) and finally settled on Staffordshire Terrier."
Further down: "To add to the confusion the name Staffordshire Terrier was changed to American Stafordshire Terrier in the 1970's when the AKC decided that the
Pit Bulls in England had enough variation to warrant being called a different breed. The UK dogs were now called Staffordshire Bull Terriers."
So basically a Pit is a Pit... they need to be deleted from the gene pool.