Author Topic: GWB on Guns....  (Read 1734 times)

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #30 on: July 06, 2004, 09:10:21 PM »
Nash, when pressed into a political corner while trying to defend his left-wing views, deftly changes the subject to Magnum, P.I. It may have been his only defense, but it is a time-honored and effective method of winning an otherwise futile argument.



Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #31 on: July 06, 2004, 09:11:51 PM »
PS: Read the book, it would make a delightfully enlightening documentary I'm sure! :D

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #32 on: July 06, 2004, 09:12:59 PM »
My argument:

"On the one hand you've got Lazs and a few others saying that Edwards appeals to mis-thinking chicks who will vote based almost solely on Edward's looks and.... On the otherhand we're bombarded by a whole truckload of neo's who can't help themsleves from making ugly jokes about Kerry."

May have been too obtuse...

Let me rephrase it:

You all are TEH CLOSET GHEY!

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #33 on: July 06, 2004, 09:14:45 PM »
Oh no,you don't Nash. TEH GHEY is waaay more angular than what you said earlier.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #34 on: July 06, 2004, 09:17:14 PM »
Don't try and pigeonhole me. I have never been nor will I ever be angular. I don't support angulars - and frankly - I don't agree with them. That being said, I'm tolerant of their angularness... as long as they don't try and touch me.

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #35 on: July 06, 2004, 09:18:04 PM »
Holy crap, dude! I think he's gonna use his Chewbacca Defense!


Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #36 on: July 06, 2004, 09:20:10 PM »
Nash, don't lie to us..... or God will bring the crows again.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #37 on: July 06, 2004, 09:21:30 PM »
That defence is bunk. Chewwie wanted to live on Endor because he could punk on the 2' Ewoks at his leisure. Seemed obvious to me.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #38 on: July 06, 2004, 09:22:53 PM »
You got me Nuke... I do have angular tendancies. SAVE ME FROM MYSELF!

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #39 on: July 06, 2004, 09:27:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
That defence is bunk. Chewwie wanted to live on Endor because he could punk on the 2' Ewoks at his leisure. Seemed obvious to me.


Soo......you perceive wookies as intergalactic bullies waging an immoral and unjust campaign of terror against the peaceful, harmless creatures of Endor? Pfffft. I suppose next yer gonna say "No blood for lumber."

:rolleyes:

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #40 on: July 06, 2004, 09:41:05 PM »
lol...

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #41 on: July 06, 2004, 09:43:13 PM »
Hey Nash, screw all these neocons....let's fly!

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #42 on: July 06, 2004, 09:44:20 PM »
in in in in... there in 2 minutes.

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
GWB on Guns....
« Reply #43 on: July 06, 2004, 10:17:05 PM »
Nash you wouldn't know a neoconservative if one bit you in the ass.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: GWB on Guns....
« Reply #44 on: July 06, 2004, 10:48:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Stolen shamelessly from Sandman's link.

Government should pay for voluntary trigger locks. (May 2000)
Avoid Columbine via gun control, values & character ed. (Apr 2000)
Would sign, but would not push, gun restrictions. (Apr 2000)
Ban automatic weapons & high-capacity ammunition clips. (Apr 2000)
Gun restrictions OK within basic right to own guns. (May 1999)
Gun show checks OK; ban guns near schools & kids. (Apr 1999)


Sounds kinda... ,womanly

http://www.issues2000.org/George_W__Bush.htm#Gun_Control


I love people that don't own guns spewing this garbage.  There is a BIG difference between a Clip (side or top fed) and a Magazine.

Karaya
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC