Author Topic: A sub-par nomination from Bush  (Read 2376 times)

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #30 on: July 07, 2004, 04:37:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
she/he/they had a choice- it was when she was spreading her legs...





You're so wise, I'm astounded

Don't change you're an example for the young reader.

Offline -MZ-

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 465
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #31 on: July 07, 2004, 04:49:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
I support airborne spraying of contraceptives in areas with income levels below a certain threshold.
"Call in an air strike!"


Say goodbye to the midwest and the south.

Offline mietla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2276
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #32 on: July 07, 2004, 04:54:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
The law was changed. :p


Sure, and it can be changed again. That why the fight over nominations of judges is so fierce.

Offline SLO

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2548
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2004, 04:57:27 PM »
soon to be seen in a Eaglers neighborhood...

all women wearing Burkaa's.....with men leading em like dogs.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #34 on: July 07, 2004, 05:18:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
I support airborne spraying of contraceptives in areas with income levels below a certain threshold.
"Call in an air strike!"


Eugenics has gotten a bad rap... Time for it again!

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17706
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #35 on: July 07, 2004, 05:42:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SLO
soon to be seen in a Eaglers neighborhood...

all women wearing Burkaa's.....with men leading em like dogs.


slight jump huh? no middle ground

abortions or burkaa's - yes, i can see the Kerry ad now - LOL
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti FTW3 | Vive Pro | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder Pedals

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #36 on: July 07, 2004, 07:19:45 PM »
I get sick when I hear about this whole "prochoice"  Do I as a man have the option to off my 2 year old if he's retarded or I cant afford to feed him anymore?  NO!  What's the difference in doing it in the womb?

A woman has a choice.....she has the choice to keep her legs crossed if she doesnt want to be pregnant.  She has a choice to be on the pill or make a guy wear a condom......if that doesn work you pay they piper.  

DO you go to a casino in vegas and ask for your money back after a slot machine takes it all?

sandman the law once said you can own as many negros as you want.  

Just cause its a law does it make it right?

Offline -MZ-

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 465
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #37 on: July 07, 2004, 07:34:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
IA woman has a choice.....she has the choice to keep her legs crossed if she doesnt want to be pregnant.  She has a choice to be on the pill or make a guy wear a condom......if that doesn work you pay they piper.  
 


What about rape and incest?  

Oh wait, this new Judge doesn't think women can get pregnant that way.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17706
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #38 on: July 07, 2004, 07:46:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by -MZ-
What about rape and incest?  

Oh wait, this new Judge doesn't think women can get pregnant that way.


show me an accurate percentage of abortions givng for this reason. Something tells me it ain't worth looking up .... it is birth control for the po and those that don't wanna be bothered with the "product" of their actions ... as long as it is accepted as a "choice" the murdering will continue and the Light will stay dim for all of us...
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti FTW3 | Vive Pro | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder Pedals

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #39 on: July 07, 2004, 07:48:30 PM »
I love how it's become all the women's fault.... "If she keeps her legs closed there won't be a problem."

Oh my god... what world are you living in?

Have any of you guys had sex with single women? (don't answer, it was rhetorical as well as goofy ). There's a boatload of uhm, nuance, pressure, jockeying for position etc. If things go right the chick won't know what hit her and no I am not talkin' rape. :D

So it takes two to tango... and I'd venture to guess that guys do more of the tangoing, so to speak.

And if all the single girls suddenly decided to cross their legs, there'd be a crisis such that the economy would collapse and the world would plummet into a global war of catastrophic porportions.

Offline xrtoronto

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4219
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #40 on: July 07, 2004, 07:58:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
and who is guiding the dumbacrats? what "voice" do they follow?


It's a voice that you don't hear.;)

Offline Furious

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3243
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #41 on: July 07, 2004, 08:36:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
...Just cause its a law does it make it right?

In this case, yes.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #42 on: July 07, 2004, 08:43:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger

Just cause its a law does it make it right?


The law was wrong before. Now, it's right.

Of course, we could go back 80+ years and revoke the 19th Amendment. Then, you'll probably have a good chance at defeating Roe v. Wade.

Roe v. Wade means less government involvment in your personal life. Funny, that the left has to champion it.
sand

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #43 on: July 07, 2004, 09:06:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
show me an accurate percentage of abortions givng for this reason. Something tells me it ain't worth looking up .... it is birth control for the po and those that don't wanna be bothered with the "product" of their actions ... as long as it is accepted as a "choice" the murdering will continue and the Light will stay dim for all of us...

I don't think you get it, the judge in question said that he doesn't believe you can get pregnant when you are raped.  He specifically said that getting pregnant when raped was 'as likely as snowfall in Miami'.

Do you really want someone that dumb in this position of power?  Or do your politics (that he happens to agree with you) blind you to this massive flaw?
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
A sub-par nomination from Bush
« Reply #44 on: July 07, 2004, 09:09:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nash
I love how it's become all the women's fault.... "If she keeps her legs closed there won't be a problem."


isn't the whole other side of this argument about the woman's right to choose??????

Quote

Oh my god... what world are you living in?


I pose to you the same question.  A woman does have a choice just like I do....not to have sex.

Quote
The law was wrong before. Now, it's right.

Of course, we could go back 80+ years and revoke the 19th Amendment. Then, you'll probably have a good chance at defeating Roe v. Wade.

Roe v. Wade means less government involvment in your personal life. Funny, that the left has to champion it.


when it comes to murdering unborn children because it is an inconvenience....yes I want the govt to intervien ban this.  

this should not be about a womans choice weather to stay pregnant but her choice not to become pregnant