Author Topic: Kerry is not an alternative.  (Read 1346 times)

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #45 on: July 09, 2004, 09:13:06 AM »
To all you Americans who are registered to vote as I am: May the best candidate win.

To the rest of you  :lol
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #46 on: July 09, 2004, 09:21:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AWMac
Sure, let me use small words to make it easier.

1) Improve education. *nu uh!*.

2) Do 2 years national service, get 4 years tuition. *nu uh!*.
3) Fire Ashcroft. *nu uh!*..

4) Clean up the environment and develop alternative energy. *nu uh!*.
5) Mend the diplomatic bridges Bush has burned and get the world united against terrorism. *nu uh!*.
6) Affordable health care, nuff said. *nu uh!*.
7) Start rewarding companies that help America instead of ones bleeding it dry. *nu uh!*.
8) Shift the economy to where the working middle class can thrive. *nu uh!*.

9) Lower the deficit. *nu uh!*.
10) Restrict lobbying. *nu uh!*.

  :aok


Convinced me which side I want to support.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #47 on: July 09, 2004, 09:31:04 AM »
here's what I get out of that...   nash want's him but nash isn't even an American.

Rpm want's him but rpm is a total liberal socialist.

The plan... kerry wants to pour more money into a failing school sysem instead of exploring alternatives...

He want's socialized medicine that will destroy our free system and is nothing but a rehash of hillary klintons plan.

mend bridges?  sell us down the river to the country's that want us to fund their failed programs.

he wants to have class warfare and bring everyone down to the same level.

he wants to futher empower and fund the most radical and powerful government agency on the planet... the EPA.

He wants to gut the auto industry and put us all on the bus and train.


I think that his radical libereralism will become as apparent (and abhorent) as nash's and rpms to the American people before the eledction.

he is LBJ all over again and with a vengence.

sure hope the economy stays good till election.

lazs

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12772
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #48 on: July 09, 2004, 09:42:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Hillary in 2008!


She won't stand a chance against
...........|
...........|
...........|
...........|
...........V
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #49 on: July 09, 2004, 09:47:17 AM »
Great post there, Preon.  All these supposed Kerry/Edwards goals are nothing more than empty rhetoric.  All you need to do is ask a single question after each of these 10 points, "How?" to see that.  To the Kerry/Edwards supporters, please look at the voting records of these two senators.  That's how you'll know what direction they'll take the country.  Kerry is rated the Number 1 most liberal senator in Congress, and Edwards is number 4.  That's a pretty left-leaning ticket, even by Democratic Party standards.
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline Red Tail 444

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2497
      • http://www.redtail.org
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #50 on: July 09, 2004, 09:48:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Torque
You know what to do if you see a baby bear.:D


Simple, if you see a bear, climb a tree. if it climbs the tree and kills you, it's a black bear. If it knocks the tree down and kills you, it's a grizzly bear.

Have a fun weekend Nash :)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #51 on: July 09, 2004, 09:50:22 AM »
Lets not forget the original poster of such vile is Canadian, and we know how well Canadians pick candidates in their elections.:eek: :lol

storch

  • Guest
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #52 on: July 09, 2004, 09:57:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sabre
Great post there, Preon.  All these supposed Kerry/Edwards goals are nothing more than empty rhetoric.  All you need to do is ask a single question after each of these 10 points, "How?" to see that.  To the Kerry/Edwards supporters, please look at the voting records of these two senators.  That's how you'll know what direction they'll take the country.  Kerry is rated the Number 1 most liberal senator in Congress, and Edwards is number 4.  That's a pretty left-leaning ticket, even by Democratic Party standards.


True enough Sabre,  But that has never stopped the dems before.  Their plan is to take more of my money and give it to the "underprivileged" people of the country.  This is actually a more liberal ticket than that rediculous Mondale/Ferraro ticket in 1984  they just shot themselves in the foot, again.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #53 on: July 09, 2004, 10:07:16 AM »
You can really summarize what kerries plans are by just saying that his plan is to raise taxes to pay for a bunch of new programs and that he is ready to sell us down the river to other countries.

You can't do any of the things he wants without spending gobs of money.  Where will he get it?   That is what people will want to know.    How will he "mend fences" with the countries that have allways despised us?   Will he send moore around to tell em all how stupid we are?

Maybe he will appoint jane fonda as ambassador?

Who will pay for national health care?   Who will pay for the "alternative fuel" study that private companies have sunk billions into?

How will he fix schools?   Give the NEA even more control?   Bush has spent record levels on schools and there is no improvement.  kerry is hogtied.. he is owned by the NEA.

kerry will weaken the second amendment even tho every serious study shows that this path leads to making things worse.   What kind of a person trys to make things worse because he owes his buddies?   What kind of a person would even associate with the brady bunch?

kerry is vile.   like rpm and nash he is an over the top liberal who hates America.

lazs

Offline mosgood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1548
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #54 on: July 09, 2004, 10:11:36 AM »
We were already sold a lemon.  Is Kerry any better.. probably not.  For me it comes down to going with the lemon you know or the one you don't.


I keep remembering Bush's pitch that he was going to restore family values in the White House.  Did that happen?  I can't turn on the tv without hearing about him or Cheneys relationship with companies that are profitiing greatly by thier policies.  What exactly ARE those family values that are in the White House and what do they do to the bottom line?

Offline mosgood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1548
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #55 on: July 09, 2004, 10:15:38 AM »
LAZ...

Where is Bush getting the money for WAR?  this isn't a slam... I'm curious about this answer... where is it REALLY coming from?  Defense spending is up, he gave us a tax break and he still can fight 2 wars.  How?  And if he can money to do this, can't all those programs go to the same source?

I know I'm showing my ignorance here, but I don't care.

Offline Preon1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 571
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #56 on: July 09, 2004, 10:31:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by mosgood
Where is Bush getting the money for WAR?  this isn't a slam... I'm curious about this answer... where is it REALLY coming from?  Defense spending is up, he gave us a tax break and he still can fight 2 wars.  How?  And if he can money to do this, can't all those programs go to the same source?


Sadly, this is the only defense for the Kerry plan that has any weight to it.  The childish 'neener neener' kind of approach where Kerry can say "But you're ALREADY doing what you're accusing me of planning!".  It worked when we were kids in the playground, and it'll work in this campaign.  I for one however,, prefer to vote for the man who plans on spending that deficit on killing our enemies rather than starting liberal, socialist initiatives (AND the war on terror (maybe)).

Offline Sixpence

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5265
      • http://www.onpoi.net/ah/index.php
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #57 on: July 09, 2004, 10:41:01 AM »
Edwards is a bad choice, imo. It scares me to think that Cheney or Edwards could be president. I don't see how anyone can vote for Kerry/Edwards, I thought there were much better choices for VP. Please, dear Lord, keep GW away from the pretzels, ty.
"My grandaddy always told me, "There are three things that'll put a good man down: Losin' a good woman, eatin' bad possum, or eatin' good possum."" - Holden McGroin

(and I still say he wasn't trying to spell possum!)

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18207
two words
« Reply #58 on: July 09, 2004, 10:46:08 AM »
Hot Air

that is skerry kerry's plan - pipe dreams
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Kerry is not an alternative.
« Reply #59 on: July 09, 2004, 10:48:31 AM »
mossgood... it is a sad fact that republicans build up the military with our taxes and the democrats build social programs.   either way costs.

We are not still paying for WWI tho but we are still paying for social security... we are paying for AA and for pandering to the NEA  If we go to national health we will be paying for a huge government program that will never go away... we are still paying for welfare.

Building up the military seems more important and a job of the government than redistributing its citizens wealth.   kerry want's to redistribute the wealth.

I am not a big Bush fan... he is far to liberal to me but... he does do what he says.. more so than any pres in recent memory.   He has built up our miitary after klinton gutted it.

soo... the economyh is good... What will happen is that if kerry is elected he will gut the military and start a whole new bunch of social programs with the "savings"  the economy will stay good because it will be a wash at first... he might even make two terms where towards the end... the cosrt of all his social programs starts to really kick in...

The new guy will be stuck with a weak military, a failing economy with high taxes as an alternative and no defense against aggression.  it will be allmost impossible for him to cut spending on the giveaway programs that the socialist put in once people are addicted... and the whole circle will start again.

If Bush stays in we will see the cost of iraq wind down... he will cut some of the more abhorrent socialist programs and keep us from becoming canada.  The military will stay strong... the countries that have allways despised us will still despise and envy us but more openly than with a klinton or kerry say... results will stay the same tho.


lazs