Author Topic: Outnumbered by Rooks...again (Read 5441 times)

Overlag · « **Reply #180 on:** August 01, 2004, 07:40:03 AM »

at least 262s was cheap

Scrap · « **Reply #181 on:** August 01, 2004, 11:38:31 PM »

Quote

hmmm hey! channel 200 has VOX doesn't it????? muhahahahahahahahahahahahhaaa aaaaa [/B]

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GODO · « **Reply #182 on:** August 02, 2004, 06:04:30 AM »

Bishes have had massive number advantage for more than 2 years, cant understand why they are crying so much now.

Overlag · « **Reply #183 on:** August 02, 2004, 08:00:28 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GODO
Bishes have had massive number advantage for more than 2 years, cant understand why they are crying so much now.

they did?

i dunno i was knight when it was the underdog, and now im bish......

NoBaddy · « **Reply #184 on:** August 02, 2004, 01:57:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Overlag
they did?

i dunno i was knight when it was the underdog, and now im bish......

Well....obviously, the Bish odds problem has been found!!!

Buzzz · « **Reply #185 on:** August 02, 2004, 05:45:16 PM »

Does anyone else think that having three sides tends to naturally even out lopsided numbers? I know it's not a perfect or exact science but when one team outnumbers the others greatly, then don't the two lesser tend to gravitate towards the one with more players?

Back in the days of old... sides used to make a verbal truce and stop aggression towards one side in order to concentrate on the other front. (Yes... the truces were always violated without exception but milkrunning is about as exciting as flying in the practice arena by yourself.)

-Buzzz

Overlag · « **Reply #186 on:** August 02, 2004, 05:52:19 PM »

we had one a bit sunday, although knits still hit us......most of them was clever though. But then the 68th squad started massive missions to undefended bases, and the whole "hold rooks down" idea flew out the window......

Mugzeee · « **Reply #187 on:** August 03, 2004, 05:32:27 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Buzzz
Does anyone else think that having three sides tends to naturally even out lopsided numbers? I know it's not a perfect or exact science but when one team outnumbers the others greatly, then don't the two lesser tend to gravitate towards the one with more players?

Back in the days of old... sides used to make a verbal truce and stop aggression towards one side in order to concentrate on the other front. (Yes... the truces were always violated without exception but milkrunning is about as exciting as flying in the practice arena by yourself.)

-Buzzz

Generally speaking this is true.
But that isnt the reality in the MA.
At the beginning you will see this happen. But as the map get old the Second place country will actually join the hoard country to try and put an end to the map. This has been played out for the 2 years i have played AH. Its more so these days when a country outnumbers the other by 60+ players.